§
Laidlaw Transit

12 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board

    324 U.S. 793 (1945)   Cited 495 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Nueva Engineering, Inc.

    761 F.2d 961 (4th Cir. 1985)   Cited 46 times
    Holding that the Brady rule is inapplicable to proceedings under the National Labor Relations Act, since the Act "is civil in nature, does not involve potential incarceration and violation of the Act does not carry with it the stigma of a criminal conviction"

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Southern Maryland Hosp. Center

    916 F.2d 932 (4th Cir. 1990)   Cited 17 times
    Noting that “the Board has on several occasions found that employers unreasonably chilled the exercise of their employees' Section 7 rights through excessive surveillance”

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Chicago Metallic Corp.

    794 F.2d 527 (9th Cir. 1986)   Cited 14 times
    In Chicago Metallic, unlike the situation presented here, the employee at issue was assigned no manual chores and had the authority and discretion to take disciplinary action against employees.

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Comgeneral Corp.

    684 F.2d 367 (6th Cir. 1982)   Cited 10 times

    No. 81-1308. Argued May 21, 1982. Decided July 29, 1982. Elliott Moore, Daniel Pollitt, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsels, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Thomas M. Green, Green Green, Dayton, Ohio, for respondent. Before ENGEL and CONTIE, Circuit Judges, and WEICK, Senior Circuit Judge. PER CURIAM. This is a petition of the National Labor Relations Board, pursuant to Section 10(e) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 151 et seq., for enforcement of its order of August

  7. Paceco v. N.L.R.B

    601 F.2d 180 (5th Cir. 1979)   Cited 11 times
    In Paceco, as here, the employer contended that its rules may have only technically violated the Act and it had attempted to rewrite them to remove the defect.

  8. Custom Recovery, Div. of Keystone v. N.L.R.B

    597 F.2d 1041 (5th Cir. 1979)   Cited 8 times
    Rejecting an ALJ's finding of inconsistent testimony when "the record reveals that [the witness] was testifying in different contexts"

  9. N.L.R.B. v. United Aircraft

    324 F.2d 128 (2d Cir. 1963)   Cited 23 times
    In NLRB v. United Aircraft Corp., 324 F.2d 128 (2d Cir. 1963), cert. denied 376 U.S. 951, 84 S.Ct. 969 (1964), the company rule prohibited distribution of union literature in nonworking areas of the company's premises.

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Limestone Apparel Corp.

    705 F.2d 799 (6th Cir. 1982)   Cited 3 times

    No. 81-1693. October 29, 1982. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Jacob Oliner, Oliner Oliner, New York City, for respondent. Petition to Enforce an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before LIVELY, KRUPANSKY and WELLFORD, Circuit Judges. ORDER This cause comes before the Court upon the motion of the intervenor, International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union, for an order enforcing the order of the National Labor Relations Board in Limestone