Lafayette Radio Electronics Corp.

7 Cited authorities

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.
395 U.S. 575 (1969) Cited 1,036 times 71 Legal Analyses
Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"
Labor Board v. Express Pub. Co.
312 U.S. 426 (1941) Cited 507 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that "the mere fact that a court has found that a defendant has committed an act in violation of a statute does not justify an injunction broadly to obey the statute"
May Stores Co. v. Labor Board
326 U.S. 376 (1945) Cited 257 times
Requiring "a clear determination by the Board of an attitude of opposition to the purposes of the Act to protect the rights of employees generally"
Bethlehem Steel Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
120 F.2d 641 (D.C. Cir. 1941) Cited 33 times
Nos. 7503, 7538. Argued February 17, 1941. Decided May 12, 1941. On Petition to Review and Set Aside an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the Bethlehem Steel Company and another to review and set aside an order of the National Labor Relations Board, wherein the Plan of Employees' Representation at the Steelton, Pa., Plant of the Bethlehem Steel Company and another intervened in support of the petition and the Steel Workers Organizing Committee intervened in support of the order
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Entwistle Mfg. Co.
120 F.2d 532 (4th Cir. 1941) Cited 15 times
No. 4770. June 10, 1941. On Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board to enforce its order against the Entwistle Manufacturing Company. Order modified and enforced. Walter B. Wilbur, of Washington, D.C., Atty., National Labor Relations Board (Robert B. Watts, Gen. Counsel, Laurence A. Knapp, Associate Gen. Counsel, Ernest A. Gross, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Sylvester Garrett, and William Stix, all of Washington, D.C., Attys
Edward G. Budd Mfg. Co. v. Natl. Labor R. Board
138 F.2d 86 (3d Cir. 1943) Cited 8 times
No. 8054. Argued November 2, 1942. Decided September 7, 1943. As Amended on Denial of Rehearing October 25, 1943. On petition to Review the Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Proceedings by the National Labor Relations Board against the Edward G. Budd Manufacturing Company for disestablishment of the Budd Employee Representation Association, which intervened, and reinstatement of two discharged employees of the company. On the company's petition to review the Board's order requiring disestablishment
Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy
29 U.S.C. § 151 Cited 5,104 times 34 Legal Analyses
Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"

Lafayette Radio Electronics Corp.

7 Cited authorities

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

Labor Board v. Express Pub. Co.

Holding that "the mere fact that a court has found that a defendant has committed an act in violation of a statute does not justify an injunction broadly to obey the statute"

May Stores Co. v. Labor Board

Requiring "a clear determination by the Board of an attitude of opposition to the purposes of the Act to protect the rights of employees generally"

Bethlehem Steel Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Entwistle Mfg. Co.

Edward G. Budd Mfg. Co. v. Natl. Labor R. Board

Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"