§

Lafayette Radio Electronics Corp.

194 N.L.R.B. 491 (N.L.R.B. 1971)
Lafayette Radio Electronics Corp.

4 Cited authorities

  1. Miranda v. Arizona

    384 U.S. 436 (1966)   Cited 61,217 times   64 Legal Analyses
    Holding that officers must inform suspects that they have a right to remain silent, that anything they say may be used as evidence against them, and that they are entitled to the presence of an attorney, either retained or appointed, prior to the interrogation

  2. United States v. Wade

    388 U.S. 218 (1967)   Cited 8,163 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Sixth Amendment provides the right to counsel at a postindictment lineup even though the Fifth Amendment is not implicated

  3. Escobedo v. Illinois

    378 U.S. 478 (1964)   Cited 4,239 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that when a suspect is interrogated with the goal of eliciting incriminating statements and the suspect has not been warned about his or her right to remain silent, the denial of the opportunity to consult with the suspect's attorney is a violation of the Sixth Amendment

  4. Texaco, Houston Producing Division v. N.L.R.B

    408 F.2d 142 (5th Cir. 1969)   Cited 9 times

    No. 25502. March 3, 1969. Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied May 9, 1969. Oliver J. Butler, Jr., Houston, Tex., J.M. Mitchell, New York City, Obediah R. Miller, Houston, Tex., for petitioner. James P. Wolf, Houston, Tex., Dixie, Wolf Hall, by Chris Dixie, Houston, Tex., for intervenor, John R. Tadlock, Gen. Counsel, Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers International Union, Denver, Colo., of counsel. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, NLRB, Robert A. Giannasi, Atty., NLRB, Washington, D.C