§

Lafayette Park Hotel

326 N.L.R.B. 824 (N.L.R.B. 1998)
Lafayette Park Hotel

9 Cited authorities

  1. Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board

    324 U.S. 793 (1945)   Cited 495 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."

  2. Medeco Sec. Locks v. National Lab. rel

    142 F.3d 733 (4th Cir. 1998)   Cited 28 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that no substantial evidence of knowledge could be inferred from the company's decision to fire a worker within a year after he had ceased to be a visible supporter of the union and had disavowed further interest in the union

  3. Aroostook County v. N.L.R.B

    81 F.3d 209 (D.C. Cir. 1996)   Cited 18 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Upholding NLRB's jurisdiction under 29 U.S.C. § 158, part of the National Labor Relations Act, over an employer

  4. BE & K Construction Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    133 F.3d 1372 (11th Cir. 1997)   Cited 11 times

    No. 96-6776. Filed October 27, 1997. Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board (Alabama Case). (NLRB No. Before BIRCH, Circuit Judge, FAY, Senior Circuit Judge, and COHILL, Senior District Judge. Honorable Maurice B. Cohill, Jr., Senior U.S. District Judge for the Western District of Pennsylvania, sitting by designation. PER CURIAM: In this labor case, BE K Construction Company ("BE K") petitions for review and the National Labor Relations

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Vanguard Tours. Inc.

    981 F.2d 62 (2d Cir. 1992)   Cited 13 times
    Holding that an overbroad rule was unlawful because of the "likely chilling effect of such a rule"

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Ohio Masonic Home

    892 F.2d 449 (6th Cir. 1989)   Cited 11 times
    Affirming Board's application of Tri-County test to invalidate no-access policy applied to off-duty employees

  7. Jeannette Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    532 F.2d 916 (3d Cir. 1976)   Cited 25 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Sustaining the Board's finding that the employer's rule broadly prohibiting wage discussions was an unfair labor practice under § 8, reasoning that "wage discussions can be protected activity and that an employer's unqualified rule barring such discussions has the tendency to inhibit such activity"

  8. American Cast Iron Pipe Co. v. N.L.R.B

    600 F.2d 132 (8th Cir. 1979)   Cited 4 times

    No. 78-1233. Submitted November 14, 1978. Decided June 4, 1979. Fredric Ingram of Thomas, Taliaferro, Forman, Burr Murray, Birmingham, Ala. (argued), and Robert F. Childs, Jr., Birmingham, Ala., on brief, for petitioner. Candace M. Carroll, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (argued), John S. Irving, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Acting Associate Gen. Counsel, and Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., on brief, for respondent. Appeal

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Beverage-Air Company

    402 F.2d 411 (4th Cir. 1968)   Cited 5 times

    No. 11961. Argued April 4, 1968. Decided September 27, 1968. Fred R. Kimmel, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Allison W. Brown, Jr., Atty., N.L.R.B., on brief) for petitioner. Ernest W. Machen, Jr., Charlotte, N.C. (Blakeney, Alexander Machen, Charlotte, N.C., on brief) for respondent. Morgan C. Stanford, Atlanta, Ga. (Adair, Goldthwaite, Stanford Daniel, Atlanta, Ga., Irving Abramson, Gen. Counsel