§

Laborers' Local Union No. 1184, Afl--Cio

296 N.L.R.B. 1325 (N.L.R.B. 1989)
Laborers' Local Union No. 1184, Afl--Cio

16 Cited authorities

  1. Sears, Roebuck Co. v. Carpenters

    436 U.S. 180 (1978)   Cited 554 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that both state and federal courts must defer to the National Labor Relations Board when an activity is arguably protected under § 7 or prohibited by § 8 of the NLRA

  2. Cty. of Wash. v. Gunther

    452 U.S. 161 (1981)   Cited 456 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that technical amendment of Title VII merely incorporates affirmative defenses of Equal Pay Act, and does not substantively alter criteria for Title VII gender-based wage discrimination claims

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Local Union No. 103, International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Iron Workers

    434 U.S. 335 (1978)   Cited 286 times
    Affirming a cease and desist order issued by the National Labor Relations Board to a striking, uncertified union, which the union alleged was inconsistent with a prior ruling of the agency

  4. Labor Board v. Insurance Agents

    361 U.S. 477 (1960)   Cited 324 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, subject to the duty to bargain in good faith, "parties should have wide latitude in their negotiations"

  5. Labor Board v. Drivers Local Union

    362 U.S. 274 (1960)   Cited 109 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In NLRB v. Drivers Local 639, 362 U.S. 274 (1960), the Court held that § 8(b)(1)(A) was "a grant of power to the Board limited to authority to proceed against union tactics involving violence, intimidation, and reprisal or threats thereof."

  6. International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Iron Workers, Local 3 v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    843 F.2d 770 (3d Cir. 1988)   Cited 119 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding review of the Board's decision to apply a new rule of law retrospectively is deferential and that the Board's ruling will be disturbed only if it wreaks manifest injustice

  7. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union No. 474 v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    814 F.2d 697 (D.C. Cir. 1987)   Cited 87 times
    Holding that court need not sustain agency interpretation that was based, not on agency's judgment, but on its erroneous interpretation of statute

  8. Orange Belt Dist. Coun. of Ptrs. v. N.L.R.B

    328 F.2d 534 (D.C. Cir. 1964)   Cited 56 times

    No. 17388. Argued November 6, 1963. Decided January 30, 1964. Mr. Herbert M. Ansell, Washington, D.C., of the bar of the Supreme Court of California, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, for petitioners. Mr. Herbert S. Thatcher, Washington, D.C., was on the brief for petitioners. Mr. David Barr, Washington, D.C., also entered an appearance for petitioners. Mr. Hans J. Lehmann, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, with whom Messrs. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board

  9. Donald Schriver, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    635 F.2d 859 (D.C. Cir. 1980)   Cited 28 times

    Nos. 78-2177, 79-1001. Argued June 17, 1980. Decided October 20, 1980. Gerard C. Smetana, Chicago, Ill., with whom William H. DuRoss, III, Washington, D.C., was on the brief for Schriver, Inc., petitioner in No. 78-2177 and intervenor in No. 79-1001. John H. Ferguson, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., with whom William A. Lubbers, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Deputy Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Acting Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel and William M. Bernstein

  10. Drivers, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen v. N.L.R.B

    553 F.2d 1368 (D.C. Cir. 1977)   Cited 15 times

    No. 75-2261. Argued January 11, 1977. Decided March 31, 1977. Hugh J. Beins, Washington, D.C., with whom Thomas H. Kohn, Arlington, Va., was on the brief, for petitioner. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., with whom John S. Irving, Jr., Gen. Counsel and John F. Depenbrock, Jr., Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for respondent. Fred W. Elarbee, Jr., Atlanta, Ga., with whom Robert L. Thompson, Atlanta, Ga., was on the brief, for intervenor. Petition for Review