Laborers, Local 859

8 Cited authorities

Labor Board v. Fruit Packers
377 U.S. 58 (1964) Cited 236 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that NLRA section 8(b)(B) does not prohibit "peaceful picketing . . . limited . . . to persuading Safeway customers not to buy Washington State apples when they traded in Safeway stores"
Wallace Corp. v. Labor Board
323 U.S. 248 (1944) Cited 162 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that corporation committed unfair labor practice
Truck Dvrs. Un. L. No. 413, Etc. v. N.L.R.B
334 F.2d 539 (D.C. Cir. 1964) Cited 56 times
Nos. 17662, 17663. Argued October 30, 1963. Decided April 9, 1964. Certiorari Denied November 16, 1964. See 85 S.Ct. 264. Mr. David Previant, Milwaukee, Wis., with whom Messrs. Herbert S. Thatcher, Washington, D.C., and L.N.D. Wells, Jr., Dallas, Tex., were on the brief, for petitioners in No. 17,662. Mr. L.N.D. Wells, Jr., Dallas, Tex., with whom Messrs. David Previant, Milwaukee, Wis., and Herbert S. Thatcher, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for petitioners in No. 17,663. Mr. Gary Green, Atty
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Bus. Mach
228 F.2d 553 (2d Cir. 1955) Cited 67 times
In National Labor Relations Bd. v. Business Mach. etc., CIO (228 F.2d 553) the Circuit Court of Appeals for this circuit declared (p. 559) that "The only thing proscribed by § 8(b)(4) is inducement or encouragement of the employees of the customers".
Douds v. Metropolitan Federation of Architects, Ect.
75 F. Supp. 672 (S.D.N.Y. 1948) Cited 51 times 1 Legal Analyses
In Douds v. Metropolitan Federation of Architects, etc., 75 F. Supp. 672 (S.D.N.Y. 1948), the court laid heavy emphasis on the economic effect of the work performed by the ally's employees.
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Millmen & Cabinet Makers Union, Local No. 550
367 F.2d 953 (9th Cir. 1966) Cited 16 times
No. 20850. October 19, 1966. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Gary Green, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Victor J. Van Bourg, Levy, DeRoy, Geffner Van Bourg, San Francisco, Cal., for respondent. Before CHAMBERS, CECIL and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges. Lester L. Cecil, Senior Circuit Judge, Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation. CECIL, Senior Circuit Judge. This cause is before the Court upon the petition
National Labor Relations Boad v. Enterprise Ass'n of Steam
285 F.2d 642 (2d Cir. 1960) Cited 12 times
In Enterprise the owner awarded to the contractor a general piping contract under which the contractor was obliged to fabricate and install such piping as the owner would provide for the project.
Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy
29 U.S.C. § 151 Cited 5,092 times 34 Legal Analyses
Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"

Laborers, Local 859

8 Cited authorities

Holding that NLRA section 8(b)(B) does not prohibit "peaceful picketing . . . limited . . . to persuading Safeway customers not to buy Washington State apples when they traded in Safeway stores"

Holding that corporation committed unfair labor practice

In National Labor Relations Bd. v. Business Mach. etc., CIO (228 F.2d 553) the Circuit Court of Appeals for this circuit declared (p. 559) that "The only thing proscribed by § 8(b)(4) is inducement or encouragement of the employees of the customers".

In Douds v. Metropolitan Federation of Architects, etc., 75 F. Supp. 672 (S.D.N.Y. 1948), the court laid heavy emphasis on the economic effect of the work performed by the ally's employees.

In Enterprise the owner awarded to the contractor a general piping contract under which the contractor was obliged to fabricate and install such piping as the owner would provide for the project.

Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"