Laborers Local 324 (AGC of California)

17 Cited authorities

Breininger v. Sheet Metal Workers
493 U.S. 67 (1989) Cited 302 times
Holding that failure of union to refer plaintiff for employment was not cognizable under the LMRDA because it did not involve "discipline"
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co.
388 U.S. 175 (1967) Cited 335 times
Holding that majority rule concept is at the center of federal labor policy
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Industrial Union of Marine & Shipbuilding Workers of America
391 U.S. 418 (1968) Cited 215 times
Holding that union could not expel member because he filed unfair labor practice charge against it without first exhausting internal remedies as provided in union constitution
Carpenters' Union v. Labor Board
357 U.S. 93 (1958) Cited 201 times
Rejecting Government position that we should defer to the Board's interpretation of the Interstate Commerce Act
Teamsters Local v. Labor Board
365 U.S. 667 (1961) Cited 174 times
Holding that the Board may not dictate specific procedures and rules that a union must adopt, not that the Board errs when it determines that a union engaged in unfair labor practices by failing to operate in accordance with objective criteria
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Financial Institution Employees, Local 1182
475 U.S. 192 (1986) Cited 76 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that labor law prohibits the assignment or transfer of a collective bargaining agreement against the wishes of the workers for whom the agreement provides representation
Pattern Makers' League v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
473 U.S. 95 (1985) Cited 76 times 2 Legal Analyses
Upholding the NLRB's interpretation of the Act
Scofield v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
394 U.S. 423 (1969) Cited 117 times 6 Legal Analyses
Upholding union rule, enforceable by fines and expulsion, imposing limitation on immediate pay that members could receive for piecework because Court found no "impairment of statutory labor policy"
Southern S.S. Co. v. Labor Board
316 U.S. 31 (1942) Cited 160 times 2 Legal Analyses
Finding an abuse of discretion where the National Labor Relations Board sought to fulfill one congressional objective but “wholly ignore[d] other and equally important Congressional objectives”
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Boeing Co.
412 U.S. 67 (1973) Cited 49 times
Upholding position that Board lacked power to review reasonableness of union disciplinary rule imposed on members who crossed picket line
Section 411 - Bill of rights; constitution and bylaws of labor organizations
29 U.S.C. § 411 Cited 1,753 times
Providing that exhausting a union's contractual remedies is a prerequisite to filing a civil action

Laborers Local 324 (AGC of California)

17 Cited authorities

Holding that failure of union to refer plaintiff for employment was not cognizable under the LMRDA because it did not involve "discipline"

Holding that majority rule concept is at the center of federal labor policy

Holding that union could not expel member because he filed unfair labor practice charge against it without first exhausting internal remedies as provided in union constitution

Rejecting Government position that we should defer to the Board's interpretation of the Interstate Commerce Act

Holding that the Board may not dictate specific procedures and rules that a union must adopt, not that the Board errs when it determines that a union engaged in unfair labor practices by failing to operate in accordance with objective criteria

Holding that labor law prohibits the assignment or transfer of a collective bargaining agreement against the wishes of the workers for whom the agreement provides representation

Upholding the NLRB's interpretation of the Act

Upholding union rule, enforceable by fines and expulsion, imposing limitation on immediate pay that members could receive for piecework because Court found no "impairment of statutory labor policy"

Finding an abuse of discretion where the National Labor Relations Board sought to fulfill one congressional objective but “wholly ignore[d] other and equally important Congressional objectives”

Upholding position that Board lacked power to review reasonableness of union disciplinary rule imposed on members who crossed picket line

Providing that exhausting a union's contractual remedies is a prerequisite to filing a civil action