§

Laborers Local 261 (Skinner Inc)

292 N.L.R.B. 1035 (N.L.R.B. 1989)
Laborers Local 261 (Skinner Inc)

7 Cited authorities

  1. W.R. Grace Co. v. Rubber Workers

    461 U.S. 757 (1983)   Cited 1,080 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an arbitrator's conclusion that he was not bound by a prior arbitrator's decision was binding on the federal courts

  2. Carey v. Westinghouse Corp.

    375 U.S. 261 (1964)   Cited 365 times
    Holding that Section 301 gives a federal court jurisdiction over a suit to enforce an arbitration clause in a collective bargaining agreement even if the case is "truly a representation case" that could also be heard by the NLRB under Section 9 of the NLRA

  3. Little Crow Mill. v. Baltimore Ohio Railroad

    476 U.S. 1158 (1986)   Cited 92 times
    Noting that trademark owners must be "afforded some latitude to assess both the impact of another's use of an allegedly infringing trademark as well as the wisdom of pursuing litigation on the issue"

  4. Intern. Longshoremen's v. Pacific Maritime

    773 F.2d 1012 (9th Cir. 1985)   Cited 30 times
    Finding union's attempt to enforce an arbitration award that was inconsistent with a prior section 10(k) proceeding constituted an unfair labor practice

  5. International Union v. Rockwell Intern. Corp.

    619 F.2d 580 (6th Cir. 1980)   Cited 24 times
    Holding that "the Board's § 10(k) determination has priority over a conflicting arbitrator's award"

  6. New Orleans Typographical v. N.L.R.B

    368 F.2d 755 (5th Cir. 1966)   Cited 39 times
    In New Orleans arbitration was permitted to proceed so there would be an expeditious resolution of the dispute in the event the Section 10(k) hearing could not resolve it. Here the Board approved a "voluntary adjustment" because it believed it settled the entire dispute and made a Section 10(k) hearing unnecessary.

  7. Dock Load. Unload., v. Richeson Sons

    280 F. Supp. 402 (E.D. La. 1968)   Cited 11 times
    In Dock Loaders, the court held that the dicta in Carey command respect, and in view of such language it ruled that the Labor Board's decision awarding the disputed work to Teamsters barred the recovery of damages in the § 301 case under the arbitrator's award.