§

Laborers Local 1184 (Ames Construction)

354 N.L.R.B. 996 (N.L.R.B. 2009)
Laborers Local 1184 (Ames Construction)

8 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Radio Engineers

    364 U.S. 573 (1961)   Cited 138 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[although] it might be better . . . to intrust [jurisdictional disputes] to arbitrators, . . . Congress, after discussion and consideration, decided to intrust this decision to the Board"

  2. Laurel Baye Healthcare of Lake Lanier, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    564 F.3d 469 (D.C. Cir. 2009)   Cited 30 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that two-member NLRB cannot issue decisions

  3. Snell Island SNF LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    568 F.3d 410 (2d Cir. 2009)   Cited 19 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Snell Island SNF LLC v. National Labor Relations Board, 568 F.3d 410 (2d Cir. 2009), we held that two Board members may exercise the Board's authority in such circumstances as a quorum of a three-member delegate group, overridden that holding in New Process Steel, L.P. v. National Labor Relations Board, ___ U.S. ___, 130 S.Ct. 2635, ___ L.Ed.2d ___, 2010 WL 2400089 (2010).

  4. New Process Steel, L.P. v. N.L.R.B

    564 F.3d 840 (7th Cir. 2009)   Cited 15 times   4 Legal Analyses
    In New Process Steel, L.P. v. NLRB, 564 F.3d 840 (7th Cir. 2009), the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit concluded that a two-member panel of the NLRB — the same panel that adjudicated the instant case — "had authority to hear the labor dispute," id. at 848.

  5. Northeastern Land v. National Labor Relations

    560 F.3d 36 (1st Cir. 2009)   Cited 14 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Northeastern Land Services v. NLRB, 560 F.3d 36 (1st Cir. 2009), the court held that, "[t]he Board's delegation of its institutional power to a panel that ultimately consisted of a two-member quorum because of a vacancy was lawful under the plain text of section 3(b)."

  6. Recon Refractory Const. Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    424 F.3d 980 (9th Cir. 2005)   Cited 11 times
    Giving the Board "considerable deference in . . . exercising its expertise" in adjudicating a jurisdictional dispute

  7. I.A.M. v. N.L.R.B

    253 F. App'x 625 (9th Cir. 2007)   Cited 2 times

    Nos. 05-75731, 05-76999. Argued and Submitted October 17, 2007. Filed October 30, 2007. David A. Rosenfeld, Esq., Weinberg Roger Rosenfeld, Alameda, CA, for Petitioner. Eric G. Moskowitz, Esq., Nancy E. Kessler Platt, Kye D. Pawlenko, NLRB — National Labor Relations Board Contempt Litigation Compliance Branch, Washington, DC, for Respondent. Beth A. Ross, Esq., Leonard Carder, Jacob Rukeyser, Leonard, Carder, Nathan, Zuckerman, Ross, Chin Remar, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent-Intervenor. On Petitions

  8. Uscp-Wesco, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    827 F.2d 581 (9th Cir. 1987)   Cited 6 times
    Applying arbitrary and capricious standard of review to NLRB conclusion of law as to jurisdiction