Laborers' International Union of North America, Local 872, AFL-CIO (No Employer Named)

8 Cited authorities

Vaca v. Sipes
386 U.S. 171 (1967) Cited 4,214 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that, under the LMRA, an "individual employee has absolute right to have his grievance taken to arbitration regardless of the provisions of the applicable collective bargaining agreement"
Air Line Pilots v. O'Neill
499 U.S. 65 (1991) Cited 1,077 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that this rule "applies to all union activity"
Radio Officers v. Labor Board
347 U.S. 17 (1954) Cited 471 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"
Lucas v. N.L.R.B
333 F.3d 927 (9th Cir. 2003) Cited 13 times
Defining substantial evidence
Jacoby v. N.L.R.B
325 F.3d 301 (D.C. Cir. 2003) Cited 10 times
Stating that unions have a duty to use “ ‘objective criteria’ and ‘consistent standards' ” in the operation of hiring-halls
Jacoby v. N.L.R.B
233 F.3d 611 (D.C. Cir. 2000) Cited 5 times 2 Legal Analyses
In Jacoby, the D.C. Circuit reiterated the reasoning it articulated in Plumbers Pipe Fitters in holding that the duty of fair representation also precludes departures from established exclusive hiring hall procedures and that the Board had articulated an erroneous view of the law in concluding that the duty of fair representation did not apply when such departures were caused by union negligence. 233 F.3d at 616-17.
Intern. U. of Oper. Eng. Local 406 v. N.L.R.B
701 F.2d 504 (5th Cir. 1983) Cited 16 times
In Operating Engineers, we held that the union violated section 8(b)(1)(A) when it changed its hiring hall procedures to permit members to take six-day jobs without forfeiting list seniority by not informing a member who declined a six-day job in reliance on the prior five-day rule.
Section 207.200 - Unlawful trespass upon land; warning against trespassing
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 207.200 Cited 33 times
Providing that a person commits a trespass by willfully going onto another's property "after having been warned by the owner or occupant thereof not to trespass"

Laborers' International Union of North America, Local 872, AFL-CIO (No Employer Named)

8 Cited authorities

Holding that, under the LMRA, an "individual employee has absolute right to have his grievance taken to arbitration regardless of the provisions of the applicable collective bargaining agreement"

Holding that this rule "applies to all union activity"

Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"

Defining substantial evidence

Stating that unions have a duty to use “ ‘objective criteria’ and ‘consistent standards' ” in the operation of hiring-halls

In Operating Engineers, we held that the union violated section 8(b)(1)(A) when it changed its hiring hall procedures to permit members to take six-day jobs without forfeiting list seniority by not informing a member who declined a six-day job in reliance on the prior five-day rule.

Providing that a person commits a trespass by willfully going onto another's property "after having been warned by the owner or occupant thereof not to trespass"