Laborers' International Union of North America, Local 872, AFL-CIO (No Employer Named)

10 Cited authorities

Vaca v. Sipes
386 U.S. 171 (1967) Cited 4,209 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that, under the LMRA, an "individual employee has absolute right to have his grievance taken to arbitration regardless of the provisions of the applicable collective bargaining agreement"
Air Line Pilots v. O'Neill
499 U.S. 65 (1991) Cited 1,076 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that this rule "applies to all union activity"
Breininger v. Sheet Metal Workers
493 U.S. 67 (1989) Cited 301 times
Holding that failure of union to refer plaintiff for employment was not cognizable under the LMRDA because it did not involve "discipline"
Ford Motor Co. v. Huffman
345 U.S. 330 (1953) Cited 881 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that a union acting in its representative capacity owes a duty of fair representation to those on whose behalf it acts
Radio Officers v. Labor Board
347 U.S. 17 (1954) Cited 470 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"
N.L.R.B. v. Air Contact Transport Inc.
403 F.3d 206 (4th Cir. 2005) Cited 15 times
Noting that whether an employer action is labeled as “counseling” or “disciplinary” does not matter for § 8 purposes as long as the action tends to coerce against engaging in protected activity
Lucas v. N.L.R.B
333 F.3d 927 (9th Cir. 2003) Cited 13 times
Defining substantial evidence
Jacoby v. N.L.R.B
325 F.3d 301 (D.C. Cir. 2003) Cited 10 times
Stating that unions have a duty to use “ ‘objective criteria’ and ‘consistent standards' ” in the operation of hiring-halls
Intern. U. of Oper. Eng. Local 406 v. N.L.R.B
701 F.2d 504 (5th Cir. 1983) Cited 16 times
In Operating Engineers, we held that the union violated section 8(b)(1)(A) when it changed its hiring hall procedures to permit members to take six-day jobs without forfeiting list seniority by not informing a member who declined a six-day job in reliance on the prior five-day rule.
Section 207.200 - Unlawful trespass upon land; warning against trespassing
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 207.200 Cited 33 times
Providing that a person commits a trespass by willfully going onto another's property "after having been warned by the owner or occupant thereof not to trespass"

Laborers' International Union of North America, Local 872, AFL-CIO (No Employer Named)

10 Cited authorities

Holding that, under the LMRA, an "individual employee has absolute right to have his grievance taken to arbitration regardless of the provisions of the applicable collective bargaining agreement"

Holding that this rule "applies to all union activity"

Holding that failure of union to refer plaintiff for employment was not cognizable under the LMRDA because it did not involve "discipline"

Holding that a union acting in its representative capacity owes a duty of fair representation to those on whose behalf it acts

Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"

Noting that whether an employer action is labeled as “counseling” or “disciplinary” does not matter for § 8 purposes as long as the action tends to coerce against engaging in protected activity

Defining substantial evidence

Stating that unions have a duty to use “ ‘objective criteria’ and ‘consistent standards' ” in the operation of hiring-halls

In Operating Engineers, we held that the union violated section 8(b)(1)(A) when it changed its hiring hall procedures to permit members to take six-day jobs without forfeiting list seniority by not informing a member who declined a six-day job in reliance on the prior five-day rule.

Providing that a person commits a trespass by willfully going onto another's property "after having been warned by the owner or occupant thereof not to trespass"