Laborers' International Local 478

15 Cited authorities

Vaca v. Sipes
386 U.S. 171 (1967) Cited 4,209 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that, under the LMRA, an "individual employee has absolute right to have his grievance taken to arbitration regardless of the provisions of the applicable collective bargaining agreement"
Shelley v. Kraemer
334 U.S. 1 (1948) Cited 1,697 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that a state court injunction to enforce a racially restrictive covenant against parties who did not wish to discriminate is state action
Humphrey v. Moore
375 U.S. 335 (1964) Cited 760 times
Holding that the union did not breach its duty of fair representation in negotiating a deal which favored some members of the same bargaining unit over others
Ford Motor Co. v. Huffman
345 U.S. 330 (1953) Cited 881 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that a union acting in its representative capacity owes a duty of fair representation to those on whose behalf it acts
Barrows v. Jackson
346 U.S. 249 (1953) Cited 764 times
Holding that a litigant may have standing to bring suit on behalf of another where that person's constitutional rights will be impaired, and the litigant is the "only effective adversary"
Steele v. L. N.R. Co.
323 U.S. 192 (1944) Cited 959 times
Holding that a labor organization must represent all members of a "craft or class of employees . . . regardless of their union affiliations or want of them"
Public Utilities Comm'n v. Pollak
343 U.S. 451 (1952) Cited 518 times
Holding that the applicability of the Fifth Amendment "concededly appl[ies] to and restrict only the Federal Government and not private persons."
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Nash-Finch Co.
404 U.S. 138 (1971) Cited 163 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that board's attempt to "enjoin" or "restrain" state court injunction fell within exception of 28 U.S.C. § 2283, which forbids court from granting "an injunction to stay" such proceedings unless otherwise authorized
Hurd v. Hodge
334 U.S. 24 (1948) Cited 256 times
Holding that racially restrictive covenants were violative of section 1982 even though the legal rights of blacks to purchase or sell other property were unimpaired
Wallace Corp. v. Labor Board
323 U.S. 248 (1944) Cited 162 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that corporation committed unfair labor practice
Section 2000e-2 - Unlawful employment practices
42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2 Cited 29,109 times 171 Legal Analyses
Adopting case law prior to June 4, 1989, “with respect to the concept of ‘alternative employment practice’ ”

Laborers' International Local 478

15 Cited authorities

Holding that, under the LMRA, an "individual employee has absolute right to have his grievance taken to arbitration regardless of the provisions of the applicable collective bargaining agreement"

Holding that a state court injunction to enforce a racially restrictive covenant against parties who did not wish to discriminate is state action

Holding that the union did not breach its duty of fair representation in negotiating a deal which favored some members of the same bargaining unit over others

Holding that a union acting in its representative capacity owes a duty of fair representation to those on whose behalf it acts

Holding that a litigant may have standing to bring suit on behalf of another where that person's constitutional rights will be impaired, and the litigant is the "only effective adversary"

Holding that a labor organization must represent all members of a "craft or class of employees . . . regardless of their union affiliations or want of them"

Holding that the applicability of the Fifth Amendment "concededly appl[ies] to and restrict only the Federal Government and not private persons."

Holding that board's attempt to "enjoin" or "restrain" state court injunction fell within exception of 28 U.S.C. § 2283, which forbids court from granting "an injunction to stay" such proceedings unless otherwise authorized

Holding that racially restrictive covenants were violative of section 1982 even though the legal rights of blacks to purchase or sell other property were unimpaired

Holding that corporation committed unfair labor practice

Adopting case law prior to June 4, 1989, “with respect to the concept of ‘alternative employment practice’ ”