§

Laborers Eastern Region Organizing Fund (Ranches at Mt. Sinai

346 N.L.R.B. 1251 (N.L.R.B. 2006)
Laborers Eastern Region Organizing Fund (Ranches at Mt. Sinai

11 Cited authorities

  1. DeBartolo Corp. v. Fla. Gulf Coast Trades Council

    485 U.S. 568 (1988)   Cited 729 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union’s distribution of handbills at the entrances of a shopping mall was not threatening, coercing, or restraining within meaning of section 8(b) because there had been "no violence, picketing, or patrolling," and "no suggestion that the leaflets had any coercive effect on customers of the mall"

  2. Cox v. Louisiana

    379 U.S. 536 (1965)   Cited 1,062 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that police could not bar a civil rights protest because of "fear of violence . . . based upon the reaction of the group of white citizens looking on from across the street"

  3. Labor Board v. Denver Bldg. Council

    341 U.S. 675 (1951)   Cited 494 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Board's assertion of jurisdiction over activities taking place at local construction site based on finding that "any widespread application of the practices charged might well result in substantially decreasing" the flow of interstate commerce

  4. Labor Board v. Fruit Packers

    377 U.S. 58 (1964)   Cited 236 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that NLRA section 8(b)(B) does not prohibit "peaceful picketing . . . limited . . . to persuading Safeway customers not to buy Washington State apples when they traded in Safeway stores"

  5. Electrical Workers v. Labor Board

    341 U.S. 694 (1951)   Cited 246 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the prohibition of picketing in furtherance of unlawful objectives is not an abridgement of free speech

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Retail Store Employees Union, Local 1001

    447 U.S. 607 (1980)   Cited 82 times
    Finding Congress struck a “delicate balance between union freedom of expression and the ability of neutral employers, employees, and consumers to remain free from coerced participation in industrial strife”

  7. Bakery & Pastry Drivers & Helpers Local 802 of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Wohl

    315 U.S. 769 (1942)   Cited 236 times
    Reversing an injunction against peaceful picketing

  8. Longshoremen v. Allied International, Inc.

    456 U.S. 212 (1982)   Cited 74 times
    Finding foreseeability relevant in determining damages, and rejecting argument that union did not foresee that refusing to handle a shipper's cargo would result in disruption of the shipper's business as facially implausible

  9. Benson ex rel. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, Locals 184 & 1498

    337 F. Supp. 2d 1275 (D. Utah 2004)   Cited 6 times

    Case No. 2:04-CV-00782 PGC. September 27, 2004 Scott Patrick Bates, Esq., U.S. Attorney's Office, William J. Daly, Esq., National Labor Relations Board, Denver, Co, for Plaintiff. Jerrald D. Conder, Esq., Salt Lake City, UT, for Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION DENYING MOTION FOR TEMPORARY INJUNCTION PAUL CASSELL, District Judge Plaintiffs Mr. Benson and the National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB") have filed a motion seeking a temporary injunction under National Labor Relations Act ("NLRA") pending

  10. Warshawsky Co. v. N.L.R.B

    182 F.3d 948 (D.C. Cir. 1999)   Cited 4 times   3 Legal Analyses

    No. 98-1277 Argued February 8, 1999 Decided July 9, 1999 On Petition for Review of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Michael W. Duffee argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was John N. Raudabaugh. Steven B. Goldstein, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Linda Sher, Associate General Counsel, John D. Burgoyne, Acting Deputy Associate General Counsel, and David Habenstreit, Supervisory Attorney. Terrance