§

La Touraine LLC d/b/a Sofitel Chicago Magnificent Mile

13-CA-236423 (N.L.R.B. Nov. 15, 2019)
La Touraine LLC d/b/a Sofitel Chicago Magnificent Mile

7 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Great Dane Trailers, Inc.

    388 U.S. 26 (1967)   Cited 323 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that substantial evidence supported the Board's finding of discriminatory conduct as the Company failed to meet its burden of establishing legitimate motives for its conduct

  2. Labor Board v. Parts Co.

    375 U.S. 405 (1964)   Cited 213 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 358 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  4. Care One at Madison Ave., LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    832 F.3d 351 (D.C. Cir. 2016)   Cited 4 times
    Rejecting similar purported catch-22

  5. ARC Bridges, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    861 F.3d 193 (D.C. Cir. 2017)   Cited 2 times

    No. 15-1113 C/w 15-1143 06-30-2017 ARC BRIDGES, INC., Petitioner v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent Raymond C. Haley III argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Andrew M. Swafford, Louisville, KY. Amy H. Ginn, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Richard F. Griffin, Jr., General Counsel, John H. Ferguson, Associate General Counsel, Linda Dreeben, Deputy Associate General Counsel, and Usha Dheenan, Supervisory

  6. Manor Care of Easton, PA., LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    661 F.3d 1139 (D.C. Cir. 2011)

    Nos. 10–1411 11–1011. 2011-11-22 MANOR CARE OF EASTON, PA., LLC, doing business as Manorcare Health Services–Easton, Petitioner v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent.Service Employees International Union Healthcare Pennsylvania (SEIU Healthcare PA), Intervenor. On Petition for Review and Cross–Application for Enforcement of An Order of the National Labor Relations Board.Charles P. Roberts, III argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Clifford H. Nelson Jr. Kellie Isbell

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ogle Protection Service, Inc.

    444 F.2d 502 (6th Cir. 1971)   Cited 3 times   3 Legal Analyses

    No. 21049. June 30, 1971. Stanley R. Zirkin, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Stanley R. Zirkin, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. Douglas C. Dahn, Detroit, Mich., for respondents; Tolleson, Burgess Mead, Robert D. Welchli, Detroit, Mich., on brief. Before CELEBREZZE, PECK and McCREE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This case is before us a second