§

La Jomac Group Inc.

15-CA-137333 (N.L.R.B. Aug. 23, 2016)
La Jomac Group Inc.

3 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. North Bay Plumbing, Inc.

    102 F.3d 1005 (9th Cir. 1996)   Cited 55 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the NLRB was not conducting "improper pre-trial discovery" by issuing investigative subpoenas because it "was merely exercising its congressionally authorized investigative powers, nothing more."

  2. National Labor Relations v. Carolina Food Pro

    81 F.3d 507 (4th Cir. 1996)   Cited 17 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Noting that a court should enforce an NLRB subpoena "if the information sought is relevant" and "described with sufficient particularly"

  3. Section 161 - Investigatory powers of Board

    29 U.S.C. § 161   Cited 344 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Authorizing the Board or any designee to compel "attendance of witnesses and the production of ... evidence ... from any place in the United States or any Territory or possession thereof, at any designated place of hearing "