§

La Femme Cosmetics, Inc.

No. 75656217 (T.T.A.B. Mar. 19, 2001)
La Femme Cosmetics, Inc.

6 Cited authorities

  1. In re E. I. DuPont DeNemours & Co.

    476 F.2d 1357 (C.C.P.A. 1973)   Cited 194 times   33 Legal Analyses
    Reciting thirteen factors to be considered, referred to as "DuPont factors"

  2. In re Nat. Data Corp.

    753 F.2d 1056 (Fed. Cir. 1985)   Cited 74 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a "likelihood of confusion cannot be predicated on dissection of a mark"

  3. Kimberly-Clark, v. H. Douglas Enterprises

    774 F.2d 1144 (Fed. Cir. 1985)   Cited 15 times
    Stating that trade dress associated with the mark of the opposed registration was irrelevant in distinguishing the mark because "such dress might well be changed at any time; only the word mark itself is to be registered"

  4. SquirtCo v. Tomy Corp.

    697 F.2d 1038 (Fed. Cir. 1983)   Cited 12 times
    Rejecting argument that SQUIRT SQUAD in standard letters is distinct from SQUIRT registered in “distinctive lettering on a dark medallion”; “[b]y presenting its mark merely in a typed drawing, a difference cannot legally be asserted by that party”

  5. Federated Foods v. Fort Howard Paper Co.

    544 F.2d 1098 (C.C.P.A. 1976)   Cited 17 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Stating that the mere existence of modern supermarket containing wide variety or products should not foreclose further inquiry into the likelihood of confusion arising from the use of similar marks on any goods so displayed

  6. Nenzell v. Hutson

    299 F.2d 864 (C.C.P.A. 1962)   Cited 1 times

    Patent Appeal No. 6738. March 9, 1962. John M. Lee, Fulwider, Mattingly Huntley, Los Angeles, Cal. (George R. Jones, Beale Jones, Washington, D.C., of counsel), for appellant. Harris, Kiech, Russell Kern, Ford W. Harris, Jr., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellees. Before WORLEY, Chief Judge, and RICH, MARTIN and SMITH, Judges. PER CURIAM. This is an appeal by Nenzell, the senior party, from the decision of the Board of Patent Interferences awarding "priority to the senior party pro forma." The board held