La Favorita, Inc.

5 Cited authorities

Virginia Electric Co. v. Board
319 U.S. 533 (1943) Cited 326 times
Stating that the purpose of the Act is to encourage and protect "full freedom of association for workers"
N.L.R.B. v. Mastro Plastics Corporation
354 F.2d 170 (2d Cir. 1965) Cited 96 times
In Mastro, the relatives of two deceased discriminatees had testified as to the discriminatees' diligent searches for work.
N.L.R.B. v. Brown Root, Inc.
311 F.2d 447 (8th Cir. 1963) Cited 71 times
In N.L.R.B. v. Brown Root, Inc., 311 F.2d 447, 454 (C.A. 8), it is said that "in a back pay proceeding the burden is upon the General Counsel to show the gross amounts of back pay due.
N.L.R.B. v. Carpenters Un.
433 F.2d 934 (9th Cir. 1970) Cited 6 times
No. 22296. October 22, 1970. Arnold L. Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallett-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Paul J. Spielberg and Avrum M. Goldberg, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Roy O. Hoffman, Director, N.L.R.B., San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner. Victor J. Van Bourg, of Levy and Van Bourg, San Francisco, Cal., for respondent. Before BARNES, HAMLEY and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: This case is before us upon petition of the National Labor
National Labor Rel. Board v. Cashman Auto Co.
223 F.2d 832 (1st Cir. 1955) Cited 20 times
In NLRB v. Cashman Auto Co., 223 F.2d 832, 836 (1st Cir. 1955), the First Circuit noted, over half a century ago, that the principle of mitigation of damages does not require success; it only requires an honest good faith effort by the complaining party.

La Favorita, Inc.

5 Cited authorities

Virginia Electric Co. v. Board

Stating that the purpose of the Act is to encourage and protect "full freedom of association for workers"

N.L.R.B. v. Mastro Plastics Corporation

In Mastro, the relatives of two deceased discriminatees had testified as to the discriminatees' diligent searches for work.

N.L.R.B. v. Brown Root, Inc.

In N.L.R.B. v. Brown Root, Inc., 311 F.2d 447, 454 (C.A. 8), it is said that "in a back pay proceeding the burden is upon the General Counsel to show the gross amounts of back pay due.

N.L.R.B. v. Carpenters Un.

National Labor Rel. Board v. Cashman Auto Co.

In NLRB v. Cashman Auto Co., 223 F.2d 832, 836 (1st Cir. 1955), the First Circuit noted, over half a century ago, that the principle of mitigation of damages does not require success; it only requires an honest good faith effort by the complaining party.