§

La Famosa Foods, Inc.

282 N.L.R.B. 316 (N.L.R.B. 1986)
La Famosa Foods, Inc.

10 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Berger Transfer Storage Co.

    678 F.2d 679 (7th Cir. 1982)   Cited 52 times
    Observing that "when the questions asked `viewed and interpreted as the employee must have understood the questioning and its ramifications, could reasonably coerce or intimidate the employee with regard to union activities,' a violation has been established"

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Moore Business Forms, Inc.

    574 F.2d 835 (5th Cir. 1978)   Cited 38 times
    Striking employee swerved in front of and blocked another employee's car; second employee threw egg

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Complas Industries, Inc.

    714 F.2d 729 (7th Cir. 1983)   Cited 24 times

    No. 81-2155. Submitted July 6, 1983. Petitioner has filed a statement asking this Court to enforce the Board's order without hearing oral argument. The Court notified respondent that it might file a "Statement as to Need of Oral Argument." Respondent has filed such a statement stating that it would prefer oral argument unless the Court is of the opinion that the facts and arguments are adequately presented in the briefs and the record and the court's decisional process would not significantly be

  5. Idaho Falls Consol. Hospitals, v. N.L.R.B

    731 F.2d 1384 (9th Cir. 1984)   Cited 13 times

    Nos. 82-7033, 82-7126. Argued and Submitted November 2, 1982. Withdrawn from Submission August 23, 1983. Resubmitted February 13, 1984. Decided April 25, 1984. Gary F. Overstreet, Finley, Kumble, Wagner, Heine, Underberg Manley, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner. Elliott Moore, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before KENNEDY and SKOPIL, Circuit Judges, and JAMESON, Senior District Judge. The Honorable William J.

  6. May Dept. Stores Co. v. N.L.R.B

    707 F.2d 430 (9th Cir. 1983)   Cited 13 times
    Holding that an evidentiary hearing on election objections must be granted if the objecting party has made "a prima facie showing of substantial material factual issues that would, if true, warrant setting aside the election"

  7. N.L.R.B. v. M B Headwear Co.

    349 F.2d 170 (4th Cir. 1965)   Cited 22 times
    Stating that a "substantial evidence" challenge presented a "familiar question"

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Charles D. Bonanno Linen Service

    782 F.2d 7 (1st Cir. 1986)

    No. 85-1031. Argued November 14, 1985. Decided January 24, 1986. John G. Elligers, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. James T. Grady, with whom Gabriel O. Dumont, Jr., Boston, Mass., was on brief, for intervenor. Howard I. Wilgoren, with whom Arthur V. Brown and Lepie, Coven Wilgoren, Framingham, Mass., were on brief, for respondent. Petition from The National Labor Relations Board. Before CAMPBELL, Chief Judge, BOWNES and TORRUELLA, Circuit Judges. BOWNES, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations

  9. Cupples Co. Manufacturers v. N.L.R.B

    106 F.2d 100 (8th Cir. 1939)   Cited 48 times
    In Cupples Co. Manufacturers v. National Labor Relations Board, 8 Cir., 106 F.2d 100, 113, we made the suggestion that if a trial examiner would, "within reasonable limits, permit each of the parties to the proceeding before him to prove his own case, in his own way, by his own counsel," charges of lack of due process for failure to accord a full and fair hearing could readily be avoided.

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Mayer

    196 F.2d 286 (5th Cir. 1952)   Cited 21 times
    Ruling that employees have the right to designate a collective bargaining representative as well as the right to revoke such designation