§

L. L. Glascock, Inc.

160 N.L.R.B. 922 (N.L.R.B. 1966)
L. L. Glascock, Inc.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Express Pub. Co.

    312 U.S. 426 (1941)   Cited 506 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the mere fact that a court has found that a defendant has committed an act in violation of a statute does not justify an injunction broadly to obey the statute"

  2. Brooks v. Labor Board

    348 U.S. 96 (1954)   Cited 300 times
    Holding that an employer has a duty to bargain in good faith for one year beginning on the date of certification of the bargaining representative by the Board

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Douglas County Electric Membership

    358 F.2d 125 (5th Cir. 1966)   Cited 33 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Douglas County Electric Membership Corp., 358 F.2d 125 (5th Cir. 1966), we stated that the specific evidence requirement was an adjunct to the Board's Rules and Regulations that an objection to the conduct of an election shall "contain a short statement of the reasons therefor."

  4. S.D. Warren Co. v. N.L.R.B

    353 F.2d 494 (1st Cir. 1965)   Cited 23 times

    No. 6452. November 8, 1965. John J. Delaney, Jr., Boston, Mass., with whom Murray S. Freeman, Gordon P. Ramsey, and Nutter, McClennen Fish, Boston, Mass., were on the brief, for petitioner. Leonard M. Wagman, Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., with whom Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Warren M. Davison and Laurence S. Gold, Washington, D.C., Attys., were on the brief, for respondent. Before ALDRICH, Chief Judge, MADDEN

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Gilmore Industries, Inc.

    341 F.2d 240 (6th Cir. 1965)   Cited 17 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Gilmore Industries, 341 F.2d 240 (6th Cir. 1965), this Court adopted the reasoning of the Board in Lobue and held that the economic inducement offered by a union in waiving initiation fees for those employees who sign authorization cards if the union wins the election impeded a reasoned choice because, under the circumstances of that case, the employees had been led to believe that they were receiving an economic benefit far greater than was actually the case.

  6. Amalgamated Clothing Wkrs. of Am. v. N.L.R.B

    345 F.2d 264 (2d Cir. 1965)   Cited 14 times

    Nos. 264, 265, Dockets 29097, 29131. Argued February 15, 1965. Decided May 11, 1965. Jacob Sheinkman, Joel Field, New York City, for Amalgamated Clothing Workers. Michael N. Sohn, Atty., National Labor Relations Board (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Melvin J. Welles, Washington, D.C., Atty.), for National Labor Relations Board. Denetrio Fernandez, Luis E. Garcia Benitez, San Juan, P.R., for Edro Corp. and Anasco Gloves

  7. Kearney Trecker v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    209 F.2d 782 (7th Cir. 1953)   Cited 13 times
    In Kearney Trecker Corp. v. NLRB, 209 F.2d 782 (7th Cir. 1953), this court considered in some detail the meaning of section 9 and the reference to "investigation" contained therein.