§

L. B. Hartz Stores

71 N.L.R.B. 848 (N.L.R.B. 1946)
L. B. Hartz Stores

6 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Express Pub. Co.

    312 U.S. 426 (1941)   Cited 505 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the mere fact that a court has found that a defendant has committed an act in violation of a statute does not justify an injunction broadly to obey the statute"

  2. May Stores Co. v. Labor Board

    326 U.S. 376 (1945)   Cited 257 times
    Requiring "a clear determination by the Board of an attitude of opposition to the purposes of the Act to protect the rights of employees generally"

  3. Medo Photo Supply Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    321 U.S. 678 (1944)   Cited 269 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that offers of benefits to union supporters that induce them to leave the union violate § 8

  4. Republic Steel Corp. v. Labor Board

    311 U.S. 7 (1940)   Cited 231 times   3 Legal Analyses
    In Republic Steel, supra, the Court refused to enforce an order requiring the employer to pay the full amount of back pay to an employee who had been paid to work for the Work Projects Administration in the meantime.

  5. Labor Board v. Bradford Dyeing Assn

    310 U.S. 318 (1940)   Cited 150 times
    Construing "affecting commerce"

  6. Motor Cargo, Inc. v. Division of Tax Appeals

    92 A.2d 774 (N.J. 1952)   Cited 7 times

    Argued October 6, 1952 — Decided November 24, 1952. Appeal from Superior Court, Division of Tax Appeals. Mr. Samuel Harber argued the cause for appellant, Motor Cargo, Inc. ( Messrs. Harber Freesman, attorneys). Mr. Abraham J. Slurzberg argued the cause for appellant, Wilson Freight Forwarding Company, Inc. ( Mr. James F. McGovern, Jr., attorney). Mr. Samuel B. Helfand argued the cause for respondent ( Mr. Theodore D. Parsons, Attorney-General, attorney). The opinion of the court was delivered by