Kurz-Kasch, Inc.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fleetwood Trailer Co.

    389 U.S. 375 (1967)   Cited 233 times
    In Fleetwood Trailer, 389 U.S. 375, 88 S.Ct. 543, the Supreme Court was required to determine whether the employer violated the Act when it hired six new employees who had not previously worked for the company instead of six former strikers who had applied for reinstatement.
  2. Labor Board v. General Motors

    373 U.S. 734 (1963)   Cited 190 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Holding that termination is also the appropriate sanction for failure to pay fees under an agency-shop clause
  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Hendricks County Rural Electric Membership Corp.

    454 U.S. 170 (1981)   Cited 79 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Hendricks, the Supreme Court approved the Board's "labor-nexus" rule as determinative of whether or not a worker is to be deemed a confidential employee.
  4. Labor Board v. Burnup Sims

    379 U.S. 21 (1964)   Cited 106 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Finding violation of § 8 "whatever the employer's motive"
  5. Hotel Emp. Restaurant Emp. Un. v. N.L.R.B

    760 F.2d 1006 (9th Cir. 1985)   Cited 26 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Rossmore House, 269 NLRB 1176
  6. H. & F. Binch Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    456 F.2d 357 (2d Cir. 1972)   Cited 22 times
    Enlarging reinstatement rights of economic strikers
  7. Motor Inn of Perrysburg, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    647 F.2d 692 (6th Cir. 1981)   Cited 1 times

    No. 79-1388. May 4, 1981. J. Mack Swigert, Taft, Stettinius Hollister, Cincinnati, Ohio, Harold F. Craig, Brown, Baker, Schlageter Craig, Toledo, Ohio, for petitioner. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Bernard Jeweler, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Bernard Levine, Director, Region 8, N.L.R.B., Cleveland, Ohio, for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before ENGEL and BOYCE F. MARTIN, Jr., Circuit Judges and MANOS, District Judge. Hon. John M. Manos, Judge

  8. Rubin Bros. Footwear v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    203 F.2d 486 (5th Cir. 1953)   Cited 17 times
    In Rubin Bros. Footwear v. National Labor Relations Bd., 203 F.2d 486 (C.C.A. 5th), the Court said: "If anything is settled in labor law and under the act, we think it is that membership in a union does not guarantee the member against a discharge as such. It affords protection against discharge only where it is established that the discharge is because of union activity."
  9. Section 6621 - Determination of rate of interest

    26 U.S.C. § 6621   Cited 1,873 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Applying a higher interest rate to past liabilities resulting from tax-motivated transactions