§
Kroger, Inc.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Marquez v. Screen Actors Guild

    525 U.S. 33 (1998)   Cited 419 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that discretionary actions taken by the union on a member's behalf are not arbitrary even where the member can demonstrate they were "erroneous or unsuccessful."

  2. Teachers v. Hudson

    475 U.S. 292 (1986)   Cited 408 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the First Amendment restrains government-compelled exactions of money

  3. Ellis v. Railway Clerks

    466 U.S. 435 (1984)   Cited 386 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that union conventions, social activities, and publications were chargeable so long as they did not relate to political causes

  4. Communications Workers of America v. Beck

    487 U.S. 735 (1988)   Cited 277 times   44 Legal Analyses
    Holding that non-members could not be charged "to support union activities beyond those germane to collective bargaining, contract administration, and grievance adjustment"

  5. Machinists v. Street

    367 U.S. 740 (1961)   Cited 468 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that because the individual Street plaintiffs "have in the course of [this action] made known to their respective unions their objection to the use of their money for the support of political causes . . . the respective unions were without power to use payments thereafter tendered by them for such political causes"

  6. Labor Board v. General Motors

    373 U.S. 734 (1963)   Cited 190 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Holding that termination is also the appropriate sanction for failure to pay fees under an agency-shop clause

  7. United Paperworkers Int'l. Union v. Buzenius

    525 U.S. 979 (1998)   Cited 21 times

    No. 97-945. November 9, 1998. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Marquez v. Screen Actors, ante, p. 33. Reported below: 124 F. 3d 788.

  8. Bloom v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    153 F.3d 844 (8th Cir. 1998)   Cited 5 times
    Concluding that "Congress intended to cast the standing net broadly . . . by authorizing `[a]ny person aggrieved' to seek review of an order by the Board under section 10(f) of the [National Labor Relations] Act"

  9. Buzenius v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    124 F.3d 788 (6th Cir. 1997)   Cited 4 times

    No. 96-5139 Argued: February 7, 1997 Decided and Filed: September 8, 1997 Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 24 John C. Scully, (argued and briefed), National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, Springfield, VA, for Petitioner. Aileen A. Armstrong, (briefed), Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Deborah E. Shrager, (argued and briefed), National Labor Relations Board, Appellate Court Branch, Washington, DC, Margaret Gaines Neigus, (briefed), National Labor Relations Board, Washington, DC, for Respondent