§

Kristin A. Harris

No. 77807042 (T.T.A.B. Jan. 23, 2015)
Kristin A. Harris

3 Cited authorities

  1. In re Sones

    590 F.3d 1282 (Fed. Cir. 2009)   Cited 11 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "a picture is not a mandatory requirement for a website-based specimen of use" and disapproving of the "rigid, bright-line rule" the PTO applied

  2. In re Chemical Dynamics, Inc.

    839 F.2d 1569 (Fed. Cir. 1988)   Cited 13 times
    Concluding that generalized sales and advertising figures do not establish secondary meaning where the alleged mark is not promoted by itself but instead as part of a larger mark or with other designs or marks

  3. Application of Servel Inc.

    181 F.2d 192 (C.C.P.A. 1950)   Cited 5 times

    Patent Appeals No. 5658. April 3, 1950. J.L. Kelly, Washington, D.C. (A. Yates Dowell, Washington, D.C., of counsel), for appellant. E.L. Reynolds, Washington, D.C. (Walter J. Derenberg, Washington, D.C., of counsel), for Commissioner of Patents. Before GARRETT, Chief Judge, and JACKSON, O'CONNELL, and JOHNSON, Judges. O'CONNELL, Judge. This is an appeal from the decision of the Commissioner of Patents in which the decision of the Examiner of Trade-Marks refusing appellant's application to register