§

Krieger-Ragsdale & Co., Inc.

159 N.L.R.B. 490 (N.L.R.B. 1966)
Krieger-Ragsdale & Co., Inc.

18 Cited authorities

  1. Jencks v. United States

    353 U.S. 657 (1957)   Cited 1,103 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that defendants are entitled to obtain the prior statements of persons to government agents when those persons are to testify against the defendants at trial

  2. Pittsburgh Glass Co. v. Board

    313 U.S. 146 (1941)   Cited 294 times
    In Pittsburgh Glass, the Court held that it was not a denial of due process for the Board to refuse to consider evidence relating to the certification issue when petitioner first sought to introduce such evidence at the unfair labor practice hearing.

  3. Denver Stock Yard v. Livestock Assn

    356 U.S. 282 (1958)   Cited 35 times
    In Denver Union the Supreme Court held that for purposes of § 304 of the Act, 7 U.S.C.A. § 205, which imposes on a market agency duties of reasonableness and non-discrimination in the furnishing of services, the phrase "at such stockyards" (defining the places where the duties applied) means every stockyard at which the agency was registered.

  4. Fay v. Douds

    172 F.2d 720 (2d Cir. 1949)   Cited 139 times
    Suggesting that district court jurisdiction is appropriate whenever a party in a labor dispute asserts non-frivolous claims of a constitutional violation

  5. Texas Industries, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    336 F.2d 128 (5th Cir. 1964)   Cited 64 times
    In Texas Industries, Inc. v. N.L.R.B., 336 F.2d 128 (5 Cir. 1964), the court held that charges filed by the Union that alleged generally that the company had "engaged in * * * unfair labor practices within the meaning of" Section 8(a)(1) and (3), and then alleged specifically various acts of coercion against a named employee was sufficient to include unfair labor practices by the company against other employees which were not mentioned in the charges.

  6. Harvey Aluminum

    335 F.2d 749 (9th Cir. 1964)   Cited 44 times
    In Harvey Aluminum, the National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB") issued a complaint charging that the petitioners engaged in unfair labor practice by maintaining surveillance of union activities of employees of Harvey Aluminum, Inc. ("Harvey") and General Engineering, Inc. ("General").

  7. Frito Company, Western Division v. N.L.R.B

    330 F.2d 458 (9th Cir. 1964)   Cited 26 times

    Nos. 18350, 18400. April 7, 1964. Hill, Farrer Burrill and Ray L. Johnson, Jr., Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner Frito Co. Daniel R. Thompson, Washington, D.C., for amicus curiae American Bottlers of Carbonated Beverages (No. 18350). Hill, Farrer Burrill, Carl M. Gould, and Stanley E. Tobin, Los Angeles, Cal., for amicus curiae American Research Merchandising Institute (No. 18350). Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel

  8. National Labor Relations Bd. v. Globe Wireless

    193 F.2d 748 (9th Cir. 1951)   Cited 42 times

    No. 12736. December 27, 1951. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Asso. Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Frederick U. Reel, Albert M. Dreyer, Attorneys, NL RB, all of Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Gregory A. Harrison, Richard Ernst, Malcolm T. Dungan and Brobeck, Phleger Harrison, all of San Francisco, Cal., for respondent. Before HEALY and POPE, Circuit Judges and LEMMON, District Judge. HEALY, Circuit Judge. This matter is before us on petition of the National

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Gorbea, Perez Morell, S. en C

    328 F.2d 679 (1st Cir. 1964)   Cited 17 times

    No. 5918. March 6, 1964. Norton J. Come, Washington, D.C., Atty., with whom Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Laurence Gold, Washington, D.C., Atty., were on the brief, for petitioner. Jaime Pieras, Jr., San Juan, P.R., with whom Pieras Martin, San Juan, P.R., was on brief, for respondent. Before WOODBURY, Chief Judge, and MARIS and ALDRICH, Circuit Judges. Sitting by designation. ALDRICH, Circuit Judge. In N.L.R.B

  10. Raser Tanning Company v. N.L.R.B

    276 F.2d 80 (6th Cir. 1960)   Cited 16 times

    No. 13790. March 29, 1960. Certiorari Denied June 20, 1960. See 80 S.Ct. 1601. M. Reese Dill, Cleveland, Ohio (of Merkel, Campbell, Dill Zetzer, Cleveland, Ohio, on the brief), for petitioner. Melvin Welles, Cleveland, Ohio (Jerome D. Fenton, Thomas J. McDermott, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Frederick U. Reel, Alfred Avins, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Regional Director Phillip Fusco, Cleveland, Ohio, on the brief), for respondent. Before MARTIN, CECIL and WEICK, Circuit Judges. CECIL, Circuit Judge. The