Kraft Foods North America, Inc.

8 Cited authorities

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.
385 U.S. 432 (1967) Cited 263 times 4 Legal Analyses
Approving "discovery-type standard"
Labor Board v. Truitt Mfg. Co.
351 U.S. 149 (1956) Cited 223 times 8 Legal Analyses
Holding that the duty to produce information relevant to a bargaining issue is derivative from the broader statutory duty to bargain in good-faith
San Diego Newspaper Guild, Etc. v. N.L.R.B
548 F.2d 863 (9th Cir. 1977) Cited 50 times
Rejecting a union's claim for information when the CBA was not up for renewal for two years and there was no evidence of contract negotiations
N.L.R.B. v. Public Serv. Elec. Gas Co.
157 F.3d 222 (3d Cir. 1998) Cited 11 times 1 Legal Analyses
Joining several courts of appeals in applying the clear and unequivocal notice rule, namely that "[t]he 10(b) period begins when the victim of an unfair labor practice receives unequivocal notice of a final adverse decision. Rumors or suspicions will not do. . . ."
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. MEMC Electronic Materials, Inc.
363 F.3d 705 (8th Cir. 2004) Cited 3 times 1 Legal Analyses
Stating the Board was “on sound ground in emphasizing that parties are bound by an approved election agreement, just as they are bound by other contracts”
General Elec. Co. v. N.L.R.B
916 F.2d 1163 (7th Cir. 1990) Cited 14 times
Nos. 89-2362, 89-2538. Argued January 24, 1990. Decided October 18, 1990. Carol L. VanHal, Paul F. Gleeson, John E. Old, Christopher A. Johlie, Vedder, Price, Kaufman Kammholz, Chicago, Ill., Earl J. Jones, Jr., General Elec. Co., Louisville, Ky., for General Elec. Credit Corp. Aileen A. Armstrong, Scott MacDonald, Appellate Court — Enforcement Litigation, Fred L. Cornnell, Jr., Charles P. Donnelly, Jr., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Irving M. King, Cotton, Watt, Jones King, Donald J. Crawford, Harvey
N.L.R.B. v. Goodyear Aerospace Corporation
497 F.2d 747 (6th Cir. 1974) Cited 6 times
No. 73-2020. Argued April 5, 1974. Decided June 4, 1974. Allen H. Feldman, N.L.R.B., for petitioner; Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, John S. Irving, Deputy Gen. Counsel, Patrick Hardin, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Joseph E. Mayer, Allen H. Feldman, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. Edward C. Kaminski, Akron, Ohio, for respondent; Philip S. Heffernan, Goodyear Aerospace Corp., Akron, Ohio, on brief. Petition from the National Labor Relations Board
J.I. Case Company v. National Labor Rel. Board
253 F.2d 149 (7th Cir. 1958) Cited 20 times
In J.I. Case we simply noted that a union has, absent a showing of relevance, no "`per se' right to information" it requests from an employer during the course of collective bargaining.

Kraft Foods North America, Inc.

8 Cited authorities

Approving "discovery-type standard"

Holding that the duty to produce information relevant to a bargaining issue is derivative from the broader statutory duty to bargain in good-faith

Rejecting a union's claim for information when the CBA was not up for renewal for two years and there was no evidence of contract negotiations

Joining several courts of appeals in applying the clear and unequivocal notice rule, namely that "[t]he 10(b) period begins when the victim of an unfair labor practice receives unequivocal notice of a final adverse decision. Rumors or suspicions will not do. . . ."

Stating the Board was “on sound ground in emphasizing that parties are bound by an approved election agreement, just as they are bound by other contracts”

In J.I. Case we simply noted that a union has, absent a showing of relevance, no "`per se' right to information" it requests from an employer during the course of collective bargaining.