§

Kraft Foods Co.

108 N.L.R.B. 1164 (N.L.R.B. 1954)
Kraft Foods Co.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Express Pub. Co.

    312 U.S. 426 (1941)   Cited 506 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the mere fact that a court has found that a defendant has committed an act in violation of a statute does not justify an injunction broadly to obey the statute"

  2. Labor Board v. Rockaway News Co.

    345 U.S. 71 (1953)   Cited 128 times
    Holding that employees may bargain away their statutory right to strike

  3. Mitchell v. Tribune Company

    342 U.S. 919 (1952)   Cited 90 times
    Employing the "target area" approach

  4. National Labor Rel. Board v. Nu-Car Carriers

    189 F.2d 756 (3d Cir. 1951)   Cited 26 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Nu-Car Carriers, Inc., 189 F.2d 756 (3rd Cir. 1951), cert. den., 342 U.S. 919, 72 S.Ct. 367, 96 L.Ed. 687 (1952), workers who leased tractors from a corporation were held to be employees, on the grounds that express contractual provisions placing the workers under the direction and supervision of the corporation were enforced by supervisors who checked up on the quality of their driving, discharged, and at times assigned routes to the workers.

  5. Harnischfeger Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    207 F.2d 575 (7th Cir. 1953)   Cited 11 times
    In Harnischfeger, while the employer and the certified union were in the process of negotiations, a group of employees walked off their jobs "to put a little heat on the [employer] and see what they were going to do."

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Natl. Die Cast. Co.

    207 F.2d 344 (7th Cir. 1953)   Cited 7 times

    No. 10877. October 9, 1953. A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Ivan C. McLeod, Washington, D.C., George J. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, Frederick U. Reel, Ruth C. Goldman, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Russell Packard, Chicago, Ill., for respondent. Before DUFFY, LINDLEY and SWAIM, Circuit Judges. LINDLEY, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board has filed its petition for enforcement of its order entered May 25, 1951, based upon its finding