§

Koppers Co., Inc.

163 N.L.R.B. 517 (N.L.R.B. 1967)
Koppers Co., Inc.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,675 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "

  2. Ford Motor Co. v. Huffman

    345 U.S. 330 (1953)   Cited 881 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union acting in its representative capacity owes a duty of fair representation to those on whose behalf it acts

  3. Steele v. L. N.R. Co.

    323 U.S. 192 (1944)   Cited 959 times
    Holding that a labor organization must represent all members of a "craft or class of employees . . . regardless of their union affiliations or want of them"

  4. Black-Clawson Co. v. Int'l Ass'n of Mach

    313 F.2d 179 (2d Cir. 1962)   Cited 97 times
    Holding Section 301 is not restricted to suits for damages or specific enforcement and will sustain a request for a declaratory judgment

  5. Ostrofsky v. United Steelworkers of America

    171 F. Supp. 782 (D. Md. 1959)   Cited 50 times
    In Ostrofsky v. United Steelworkers of America, 171 F. Supp. 782 (D.C.Md. 1959), aff'd 273 F.2d 614 (4th Cir. 1960), where an employee sued his employer and union, the court, applying the reasoning in Jenkins v. Wm. Schluderberg — T. J. Kurdle Co., supra, held that an employee could not sue his employer unless the union acted arbitrarily or in a discriminatory manner and thereby breached its duty of fair representation.

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Silver Bakery, of Newton Mass

    351 F.2d 37 (1st Cir. 1965)   Cited 13 times

    No. 6504. October 1, 1965. Paul J. Spielberg, Washington, D.C., with whom Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Glen M. Bendixsen, Washington, D.C., were on brief, for petitioner. Allan A. Tepper, Boston, Mass., with whom Snyder, Tepper, Berlin Katz, Boston, Mass., was on brief, for Silver Bakery, Inc., of Newton, respondent. Warren H. Pyle, Boston, Mass., with whom Angoff, Goldman, Manning Pyle, Boston, Mass., was

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Universal Camera

    179 F.2d 749 (2d Cir. 1950)   Cited 24 times

    No. 54, Docket 21395. Argued December 6, 1949. Decided January 10, 1950. A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Ruth Weyand, Asst. Gen. Counsel, William J. Avrutis, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Kaye, Scholer, Fierman Hays, New York City, Frederick R. Livingston, New York City, for respondent. On petition of the National Labor Relations Board for an order, "enforcing" an order of the Board to "cease

  8. Cathey v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    189 F.2d 428 (5th Cir. 1951)   Cited 4 times
    In Cathey v. National Labor Relations Board, 5 Cir., 189 F.2d 428, a petition for enforcement of an order of the Labor Board was denied and the complaint dismissed by the Court of Appeals, where the union concerned had failed to comply with the non-Communist affidavit provisions of the Act.