§

KNOLLWOOD COUNTRY CLUB

365 NLRB No. 22 (N.L.R.B. 2017)
KNOLLWOOD COUNTRY CLUB

15 Cited authorities

  1. Fibreboard Corp. v. Labor Board

    379 U.S. 203 (1964)   Cited 731 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA

  2. Metropolitan Edison Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    460 U.S. 693 (1983)   Cited 311 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union may, under certain circumstances, waive members' NLRA rights

  3. First National Maintenance Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    452 U.S. 666 (1981)   Cited 269 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer has no duty to bargain over a decision to shut down part of its business purely for economic reasons

  4. Mastro Plastics Corp. v. Labor Board

    350 U.S. 270 (1956)   Cited 403 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that collective-bargaining agreement "must be read as a whole and in light of the law relating to it when it was made"

  5. Labor Board v. Truitt Mfg. Co.

    351 U.S. 149 (1956)   Cited 223 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the duty to produce information relevant to a bargaining issue is derivative from the broader statutory duty to bargain in good-faith

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Strong

    393 U.S. 357 (1969)   Cited 115 times
    Explaining that, though broad, the NLRA's grant of remedial power "does not authorize punitive measures"

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. C & C Plywood Corp.

    385 U.S. 421 (1967)   Cited 117 times
    Holding that the NLRB has the authority to interpret CBAs in the first instance where its interpretation is for the purpose of “enforc[ing] a statutory right which Congress considered necessary to allow labor and management to get on with the process of reaching fair terms and conditions of employment”

  8. N.L.R.B. v. U.S. Postal Service

    8 F.3d 832 (D.C. Cir. 1993)   Cited 50 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Upholding postal service's exercise of contractual right to reduce employees' hours in response to budget reduction

  9. Regal Cinemas, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    317 F.3d 300 (D.C. Cir. 2003)   Cited 30 times
    Affirming the Board's finding of a Section 8 violation where the layoff was motivated by labor costs rather than technological advances

  10. HealthBridge Management, LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    798 F.3d 1059 (D.C. Cir. 2015)   Cited 12 times   2 Legal Analyses

    Nos. 14–1101 14–1116. 2015-08-18 HEALTHBRIDGE MANAGEMENT, LLC, et al., Petitioners v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. On Petition for Review and Cross–Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Erin E. Murphy argued the cause for petitioners. With her on the briefs were Paul D. Clement and William R. Levi. Jared D. Cantor, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Richard F. Griffin, Jr., General