§

Knogo Corporation

262 N.L.R.B. 1346 (N.L.R.B. 1982)
Knogo Corporation

5 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,036 times   71 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. Labor Board v. Parts Co.

    375 U.S. 405 (1964)   Cited 213 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 358 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  4. Tipton Elec. Co. v. N.L.R.B

    621 F.2d 890 (8th Cir. 1980)   Cited 4 times

    No. 79-1387. Submitted February 11, 1980. Decided April 14, 1980. Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied May 19, 1980. Lewis C. Green, Green, Hennings Henry, St. Louis, Mo., argued, and Richard D. Lageson, St. Louis, Mo., on brief, for petitioners. Barbara Kraft, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., argued, Andrew F. Tranovich, Atty., Washington, D.C., Norton J. Come, Acting Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Acting Associate Gen. Counsel, and Elliott Moore, Deputy

  5. Continental Distilling Sales Co. v. N.L.R.B

    348 F.2d 246 (7th Cir. 1965)   Cited 4 times

    Nos. 14463, 14516. June 28, 1965. Harold A. Katz, Irving M. Friedman, Glenn P. Schwartz, Chicago, James C. Paradise, Cincinnati, Ohio, for petitioner Union. Lee A. Freeman, William L. Sharp, Sanford I. Wolff, Chicago, for Continental Distilling Sales Co., petitioner. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Melvin Pollack, Atty., N.L.R.B., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before DUFFY, KNOCH and KILEY, Circuit Judges. DUFFY