KMAC, Inc.

3 Cited authorities

  1. Searock v. Stripling

    736 F.2d 650 (11th Cir. 1984)   Cited 217 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "control is the test" for whether documents need to be produced, where control "is defined not only as possession, but as the legal right to obtain the documents requested upon demand"
  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. North Bay Plumbing, Inc.

    102 F.3d 1005 (9th Cir. 1996)   Cited 55 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the NLRB was not conducting "improper pre-trial discovery" by issuing investigative subpoenas because it "was merely exercising its congressionally authorized investigative powers, nothing more."
  3. National Labor Relations v. Carolina Food Pro

    81 F.3d 507 (4th Cir. 1996)   Cited 17 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Noting that a court should enforce an NLRB subpoena "if the information sought is relevant" and "described with sufficient particularly"