§
Kiro, Inc.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Lynch v. Merrell-National Laboratories

    830 F.2d 1190 (1st Cir. 1987)   Cited 93 times
    Holding that the plaintiff's in vivo and in vitro studies were inadmissible; therefore, insufficient evidence existed to avoid summary judgment for the defendant

  2. District Lodge 64 v. N.L.R.B

    949 F.2d 441 (D.C. Cir. 1991)   Cited 25 times
    Noting that “Article III grounds” such as stare decisis and the principle that litigants in similar situation should be treated the same “are inapplicable to administrative adjudications”

  3. Home Ins. Co. v. Ballenger Corp.

    74 F.R.D. 93 (N.D. Ga. 1977)   Cited 41 times
    Holding that general allegations of relevancy are insufficient to overcome specific objections of an adverse party to the disclosure of reserve information

  4. Lynch v. Merrell-National Laboratories

    646 F. Supp. 856 (D. Mass. 1986)   Cited 23 times
    Noting that "this Court still could not accept result-based reanalysis of epidemiological studies and criticisms of others' methodology, such as that performed here by Dr. Swan, as reliable data upon which to base an opinion on causation"

  5. Procter Gamble Mfg. Co. v. N.L.R.B

    603 F.2d 1310 (8th Cir. 1979)   Cited 17 times

    No. 78-1716. Submitted March 12, 1979. Decided August 23, 1979. Harold S. Freeman of Dinsmore, Shohl, Coates Deupree, Cincinnati, Ohio, argued and Michael S. Glassman, Cincinnati, Ohio, on appendix and briefs, for petitioner. Edward S. Dorsey, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. argued, and Andrew E. Tranovich, Atty., John S. Irving, Gen. Counsel; John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel; Robert E. Allen, Acting Assoc. Gen. Counsel; and Elliott Moore, Deputy Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C.,

  6. General Motors Corp., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    700 F.2d 1083 (6th Cir. 1983)   Cited 13 times
    Finding that the union need not affirmatively demonstrate the relevance of information requested

  7. Press Democrat Pub. Co. v. N.L.R.B

    629 F.2d 1320 (9th Cir. 1980)   Cited 15 times

    Nos. 79-7086 to 79-7089 and 79-7158 to 79-7161. Argued and Submitted July 10, 1980. Decided October 8, 1980. James E. Boddy, Jr., Irwin Leff, San Francisco, Cal., argued, for petitioners; James C. Paras, Irwin Leff, San Francisco, Cal., on brief. W. Christian Schumann, NLRB, Washington, D.C., argued, for respondent; Elliott Moore, Washington, D.C., on brief. Petitions for Review and Cross-Applications for Enforcement of Orders of National Labor Relations Board. Before WRIGHT, KENNEDY and POOLE, Circuit

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Leland Stanford Jr. University

    715 F.2d 473 (9th Cir. 1983)   Cited 7 times
    Enforcing order to provide union with information about employees outside the bargaining unit

  9. Shape of Things To Come, Inc. v. County of Kane

    588 F. Supp. 1192 (N.D. Ill. 1984)   Cited 2 times

    No. 83 C 812. June 20, 1984. Michael A. Reiter, Katten, Muchin, Zavis, Pearl Galler, Barry J. Parker, Chicago, Ill., Frank Owen, Hinsdale, Ill., for plaintiff. Anthony G. Scariano, Anthony Scariano, Robert H. Ellch, David W. Regnier, Scariano, Kula Assoc., Chicago Heights, Ill., James T. Doyle, P. Scott Courtin, John K. Lohrstorfer, Steven L. Kadden, City of Aurora Law Dept., Aurora, Ill., John L. Martin, James L. Tuohy, Tuohy Martin, Chicago, Ill., Pamela Kirkland Jensen, Linda Soreff Siegel, David