Kingsport Publishing Corp.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Procter Gamble Ind. U. v. Procter Gamble

    312 F.2d 181 (2d Cir. 1962)   Cited 136 times
    Concluding that an agreement providing that arbitration may be called for "by either party hereto, the Employer and the Union . . . clearly indicates that only the union or the employer can demand arbitration"
  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Reed Prince MFG

    205 F.2d 131 (1st Cir. 1953)   Cited 118 times
    In Reed Prince, supra, this court affirmed the Board's finding of refusal to bargain in good faith only "[a]fter an attentive review of the entire record of the bargaining negotiations."
  3. Industrial Un. of Mar. Ship. W. v. N.L.R.B

    320 F.2d 615 (3d Cir. 1963)   Cited 63 times   4 Legal Analyses

    Nos. 14052, 14102. Argued May 21, 1963. Decided July 30, 1963. M.H. Goldstein, Philadelphia, Pa. (Goldstein Barkan, Michael Brodie, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for petitioner, Industrial Union of Marine and Shipbuilding Workers of America, AFL-CIO. John H. Morse, New York City (Frank Cummings, New York City, Cravath, Swaine Moore, New York City, on the brief), for Bethlehem Steel Co. (Shipbuilding Division). Nancy M. Sherman, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Proof Co.

    242 F.2d 560 (7th Cir. 1957)   Cited 11 times

    No. 11828. March 27, 1957. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Ross M. Madden, Edward T. Maslanka, Chicago, Ill., Theophil C. Kammholz, Gen. Counsel, Arnold Ordman, Florian J. Bartosic, Washington, D.C., for National Labor Relations Board. Albert M. Stern, Stern, Milmet Rossier, Detroit, Mich., for respondent. Before FINNEGAN, LINDLEY and SCHNACKENBERG, Circuit Judges. SCHNACKENBERG, Circuit Judge. By its petition, the National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ross Gear Tool

    158 F.2d 607 (7th Cir. 1947)   Cited 5 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Ross Gear Tool Co., 158 F.2d 607 (7 Cir. 1947), a female employee named Ford had engaged in a serious dispute with other employees.