§

Kingsbridge Heights Rehabilitation

02-CA-037660 (N.L.R.B. Jul. 9, 2007)
Kingsbridge Heights Rehabilitation

12 Cited authorities

  1. Boys Markets v. Clerks Union

    398 U.S. 235 (1970)   Cited 856 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Norris–LaGuardia Act's anti-injunction provisions do not bar enforcement of arbitration agreements

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fleetwood Trailer Co.

    389 U.S. 375 (1967)   Cited 233 times
    In Fleetwood Trailer, 389 U.S. 375, 88 S.Ct. 543, the Supreme Court was required to determine whether the employer violated the Act when it hired six new employees who had not previously worked for the company instead of six former strikers who had applied for reinstatement.

  3. Labor Board v. Mackay Co.

    304 U.S. 333 (1938)   Cited 535 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer may replace striking workers with others to carry on business so long as the employer is not guilty of unfair labor practices

  4. SCM Corp. v. Advance Business Systems & Supply Co.

    397 U.S. 920 (1970)   Cited 200 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Upholding a delay of three months where only prejudice shown was that the defendants could not recall details of the days in the distant past; no special circumstances

  5. Laidlaw Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    414 F.2d 99 (7th Cir. 1969)   Cited 81 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that while an employer is not obligated to discharge permanent replacements to make room for returning economic strikers, the employer must place the former strikers on a preferential recall list

  6. National Steel & Shipbuilding Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    156 F.3d 1268 (D.C. Cir. 1998)   Cited 6 times
    Upholding the Board's finding that a company committed an unfair labor practice by videotaping union rallies without sufficient justification

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Colonial Haven Nursing Home, Inc.

    542 F.2d 691 (7th Cir. 1976)   Cited 26 times
    Holding that "anticipatory photographing. . . . does not violate § 8 of the Act where the photographs are taken to establish for purposes of an injunction suit that pickets engaged in violence"

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ancor Concepts, Inc.

    166 F.3d 55 (2d Cir. 1999)   Cited 2 times

    No. 98-4140. Argued: December 2, 1998. Decided: January 15, 1999. Application For Enforcement of an Order of The National Labor Relations Board Petition for enforcement of an order of the National Labor Relations Board, concluding that an employer violated Sections 8(a)(1) and (a)(3) of the National Labor Relations Act through statements made to its employees' union following an economic lockout. Enforcement denied. Margaret Gaines, Esq. National Labor Relations Board Office of the Regional Director

  9. Local 825, International Union of Operating Engineers v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    829 F.2d 458 (3d Cir. 1987)   Cited 9 times

    No. 86-3641. Argued June 19, 1987. Decided September 25, 1987. David Silberman, Laurence Gold (argued), Michael R. Fanning, Intern. Union of Operating Engineers, Washington, D.C., Paul A. Montalbano (argued), David Solomon, Schneider, Cohen, Solomon, Leder and Montalbano, Jersey City, N.J. (Michael H. Gottesman, Robert M. Weinberg, David A. Sklansky, Washington, D.C., of counsel), for petitioner. Robert E. Allen, Victoria A. Higman (argued), Elliott Moore, Rosemary M. Collyer, N.L.R.B., Washington

  10. Eads Transfer, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    989 F.2d 373 (9th Cir. 1993)   Cited 2 times

    Nos. 91-70583, 91-70664. Submitted March 4, 1993. The panel unanimously agrees that this case is appropriate for submission without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a), 9th Cir. R. 34-4. Decided April 5, 1993. Gary M. Carlson, Portland, OR, for petitioner-cross-respondent. Aileen A. Armstrong, N.L.R.B., Washington, DC, for respondent-cross-appellant. Petition for Review Cross Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before: TANG, POOLE, and RYMER, Circuit Judges