§

Kingsbridge Heights

02-CA-038418 (N.L.R.B. Nov. 18, 2009)
Kingsbridge Heights

10 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. J. Weingarten, Inc.

    420 U.S. 251 (1975)   Cited 434 times   64 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer commits an unfair labor practice by compelling an employee to attend an investigatory meeting that could lead to discipline without allowing the employee to bring a union witness

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.

    385 U.S. 432 (1967)   Cited 265 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Approving "discovery-type standard"

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 358 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  4. H.J. Heinz Co. v. Labor Board

    311 U.S. 514 (1941)   Cited 241 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In H.J. Heinz Co. v. N.L.R.B., 311 U.S. 514, 61 S.Ct. 320, 85 L.Ed. 309 and Cox v. Gatliff Coal Co., D.C., 59 F. Supp. 882, affirmed 6 Cir., 152 F.2d 52, it was stated that the Act contemplated that a collective bargaining agreement be in writing.

  5. Curtiss-Wright, Wright Aero. Div. v. N.L.R.B

    347 F.2d 61 (3d Cir. 1965)   Cited 55 times
    Noting the Board has "considerable leeway in amplifying or expanding certain details not specifically set forth in the complaint if they accord with the general substance of the complaint"

  6. Holly Farms Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    48 F.3d 1360 (4th Cir. 1995)   Cited 14 times
    Holding that employer had a duty to bargain with union over the effects of a merger on “wages, hours, work rules, work schedules, and work locations”

  7. Resort Nursing Home v. N.L.R.B

    389 F.3d 1262 (D.C. Cir. 2004)   Cited 5 times
    In Resort Nursing Home v. NLRB, 389 F.3d 1262 (D.C. Cir. 2004), the court held that there was no collusion or conspiracy when a multiemployer association and union began negotiations for a new agreement eight months prior to the expiration of the old agreement, id. at 1271, and that the Chel La Cort rule is rational and consistent with the Act, id. at 1269.

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Southern Maryland Hosp. Center

    916 F.2d 932 (4th Cir. 1990)   Cited 17 times
    Noting that “the Board has on several occasions found that employers unreasonably chilled the exercise of their employees' Section 7 rights through excessive surveillance”

  9. Chicago Tribune Co. v. N.L.R.B

    965 F.2d 244 (7th Cir. 1992)   Cited 6 times

    Nos. 91-2750, 91-2916. Argued April 1, 1992. Decided May 29, 1992. Rehearing Denied June 24, 1992. Elizabeth Kinney, N.L.R.B., Region 13, Chicago, Ill., Aileen A. Armstrong, Linda J. Dreeben, David Seid (argued), N.L.R.B., Appellate Court, Enforcement Litigation, John C. Truesdale, N.L.R.B., Contempt Litigation Branch, Washington, D.C. and Paul Bosanac, N.L.R.B., Region 30, Milwaukee, Wis., for N.L.R.B. R. Eddie Wayland (argued), E. Andrew Norwood, King Ballow, Nashville, Tenn. and William O. Howe

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Cast Optics Corporation

    458 F.2d 398 (3d Cir. 1972)   Cited 11 times

    No. 71-1098. Argued November 11, 1971. Decided March 23, 1972. Charles Steel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Samuel Gruber, Gruber Turkel, Stamford, Conn., for respondent. Joel Ronald Ax, Associate Gen. Counsel, New York City, for intervenor. Before VAN DUSEN and JAMES ROSEN, Circuit Judges, and BECKER, District Judge. OPINION OF THE COURT EDWARD R. BECKER,[fn*] District Judge. [fn*] Sitting by designation. I. This case is before the Court on the application of the National Labor Relations