King Soopers, Inc.

9 Cited authorities

Fibreboard Corp. v. Labor Board
379 U.S. 203 (1964) Cited 734 times 7 Legal Analyses
Holding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA
Metropolitan Edison Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
460 U.S. 693 (1983) Cited 314 times 8 Legal Analyses
Holding that a union may, under certain circumstances, waive members' NLRA rights
Ford Motor Co. (Chicago Stamping Plant) v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
441 U.S. 488 (1979) Cited 290 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that proposal concerning in-plant cafeteria prices was within duty to bargain despite fact that prices were set by third-party supplier rather than employer
Facet Enterprises, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
907 F.2d 963 (10th Cir. 1990) Cited 30 times
In Facet Enterprises, we reasoned "[t]he policies underlying [§ 160(e)], i.e., notice, efficiency and providing the Board with the first opportunity to consider a claim, would have been undermined had the Supreme Court allowed judicial review" in Woelke & Romero and Garment Workers' Union.
Pergament United Sales, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
920 F.2d 130 (2d Cir. 1990) Cited 20 times 9 Legal Analyses
Holding that "due process is satisfied when a complaint gives a respondent fair notice . . . and when the conduct implicated in the alleged violation has been fully and fairly litigated"
Newspaper Guild, Etc. v. N.L.R.B
636 F.2d 550 (D.C. Cir. 1980) Cited 21 times 1 Legal Analyses
In Newspaper Guild of Greater Phila. v. N.L.R.B., 636 F.2d 550, 560 (D.C. Cir. 1980), the circuit court wrote that editorial integrity is to a newspaper what machinery is to a manufacturer.
Tocco Div. of Park-Ohio Industries v. N.L.R.B
702 F.2d 624 (6th Cir. 1983) Cited 11 times
Relying on International Union of Operating Engineers, Local Union 18, 238 NLRB 652
Murphy Diesel Company v. N.L.R.B
454 F.2d 303 (7th Cir. 1971) Cited 14 times
In Murphy Diesel Co. v. NLRB, 454 F.2d 303 (7th Cir. 1971), the court emphasized that the "right to impose work rules and discipline" was not a part of the contract or the negotiations leading to it.
Section 158 - Unfair labor practices
29 U.S.C. § 158 Cited 10,339 times 88 Legal Analyses
Granting employees a wage increase without bargaining with Local 355

King Soopers, Inc.

9 Cited authorities

Holding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA

Holding that a union may, under certain circumstances, waive members' NLRA rights

Holding that proposal concerning in-plant cafeteria prices was within duty to bargain despite fact that prices were set by third-party supplier rather than employer

In Facet Enterprises, we reasoned "[t]he policies underlying [§ 160(e)], i.e., notice, efficiency and providing the Board with the first opportunity to consider a claim, would have been undermined had the Supreme Court allowed judicial review" in Woelke & Romero and Garment Workers' Union.

Holding that "due process is satisfied when a complaint gives a respondent fair notice . . . and when the conduct implicated in the alleged violation has been fully and fairly litigated"

In Newspaper Guild of Greater Phila. v. N.L.R.B., 636 F.2d 550, 560 (D.C. Cir. 1980), the circuit court wrote that editorial integrity is to a newspaper what machinery is to a manufacturer.

Relying on International Union of Operating Engineers, Local Union 18, 238 NLRB 652

In Murphy Diesel Co. v. NLRB, 454 F.2d 303 (7th Cir. 1971), the court emphasized that the "right to impose work rules and discipline" was not a part of the contract or the negotiations leading to it.

Granting employees a wage increase without bargaining with Local 355