King David Center

7 Cited authorities

Labor Board v. Walton Mfg. Co.
369 U.S. 404 (1962) Cited 298 times
Explaining that the deferential standard of review is appropriate because the "[the ALJ] ... sees the witnesses and hears them testify, while the Board and the reviewing court look only at cold records"
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Grand Canyon Mining Co.
116 F.3d 1039 (4th Cir. 1997) Cited 36 times 1 Legal Analyses
No. 96-1990, 96-2089. Argued May 7, 1997. Decided June 27, 1997. On Application for Enforcement and Cross-Petition for Review of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. (11-CA-15801, 11-CA-16059). ARGUED: Jeffrey Lawrence Horowitz, NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Matthew Woodruff Sawchak, SMITH, HELMS, MULLISS MOORE, L.L.P., Raleigh, North Carolina, for Respondent. ON BRIEF: Frederick L. Feinstein, General Counsel, Linda Sher, Associate General Counsel, Aileen
J.P. Stevens Co., Inc. v. N.L.R.B
461 F.2d 490 (4th Cir. 1972) Cited 60 times
Inquiring whether substantial evidence supported a finding that a benefit announcement was timed to "give [employees] cause to infer that the benefit might be withdrawn or future benefits withheld should they select a union to represent them"
Hotel Emp. Restaurant Emp. Un. v. N.L.R.B
760 F.2d 1006 (9th Cir. 1985) Cited 26 times 6 Legal Analyses
Affirming Rossmore House, 269 NLRB 1176
N.L.R.B. v. Bestway Trucking, Inc.
22 F.3d 177 (7th Cir. 1994) Cited 5 times
Holding that "the demonstrated falsity of some of the reasons offered by [the employer] for its actions. . . support the Board's conclusion that [the employer] acted with anti-union animus" when it made the employees' working conditions intolerable
Gossen Co., a Div. of U.S. Gypsum v. N.L.R.B
719 F.2d 1354 (7th Cir. 1983) Cited 9 times
Adopting test from Plasticrafts, Inc. v. N.L.R.B., 586 F.2d 185, 188 (10th Cir. 1978)
Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy
29 U.S.C. § 151 Cited 5,091 times 34 Legal Analyses
Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"

King David Center

7 Cited authorities

Labor Board v. Walton Mfg. Co.

Explaining that the deferential standard of review is appropriate because the "[the ALJ] ... sees the witnesses and hears them testify, while the Board and the reviewing court look only at cold records"

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Grand Canyon Mining Co.

J.P. Stevens Co., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

Inquiring whether substantial evidence supported a finding that a benefit announcement was timed to "give [employees] cause to infer that the benefit might be withdrawn or future benefits withheld should they select a union to represent them"

Hotel Emp. Restaurant Emp. Un. v. N.L.R.B

Affirming Rossmore House, 269 NLRB 1176

N.L.R.B. v. Bestway Trucking, Inc.

Holding that "the demonstrated falsity of some of the reasons offered by [the employer] for its actions. . . support the Board's conclusion that [the employer] acted with anti-union animus" when it made the employees' working conditions intolerable

Gossen Co., a Div. of U.S. Gypsum v. N.L.R.B

Adopting test from Plasticrafts, Inc. v. N.L.R.B., 586 F.2d 185, 188 (10th Cir. 1978)

Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"