§

King Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.

174 N.L.R.B. 531 (N.L.R.B. 1969)
King Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Great Dane Trailers, Inc.

    388 U.S. 26 (1967)   Cited 322 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that substantial evidence supported the Board's finding of discriminatory conduct as the Company failed to meet its burden of establishing legitimate motives for its conduct

  2. J.I. Case Co. v. Labor Board

    321 U.S. 332 (1944)   Cited 457 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the result of a collective bargaining agreement is not "a contract of employment except in rare cases; no one has a job by reason of it and no obligation to any individual ordinarily comes into existence from it alone"

  3. Medo Photo Supply Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    321 U.S. 678 (1944)   Cited 269 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that offers of benefits to union supporters that induce them to leave the union violate § 8

  4. International Tel. and Tel. Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    382 F.2d 366 (3d Cir. 1967)   Cited 30 times
    Finding that a mixed unit of professional and non-professional employees, though frowned upon within section 9 of the Act, was still protected by section 8's bargaining requirement

  5. General Elec., Battery Prod., v. N.L.R.B

    400 F.2d 713 (5th Cir. 1968)   Cited 24 times

    No. 24548. August 22, 1968. Rehearing Denied October 28, 1968. Robert C. Lanquist, Otto R.T. Bowden, Jacksonville, Fla., for petitioner. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Thomas R. Beech, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Frank Hamilton, Jr., Tampa, Fla., amicus curiae. Before BELL, GOLDBERG and DYER, Circuit Judges. GOLDBERG, Circuit Judge: In our assessment of another industrial drama, we again turn to the rise and decline of a local union: its birth and early struggles

  6. Bryant Chucking Grinder Company v. N.L.R.B

    389 F.2d 565 (2d Cir. 1967)   Cited 19 times

    No. 25, Docket 30844. Argued October 2, 1967. Decided December 12, 1967. Kenneth C. McGuiness, Washington, D.C. (Vedder, Price, Kaufman, Kammholz McGuiness, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. George B. Driesen, Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Peter Ames Eveleth, Washington, D.C., Atty., on the brief), for respondent. Before FRIENDLY, HAYS and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. HAYS, Circuit

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Cactus Petroleum, Inc.

    355 F.2d 755 (5th Cir. 1966)   Cited 5 times

    No. 21961. February 2, 1966. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, William J. Avrutis, Atty., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Willis Witt, Charles Sapp, Liddell, Austin, Dawson Sapp, Houston, Tex., for respondent. Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, COLEMAN, Circuit Judge, and HUNTER, District Judge. HUNTER, District Judge. The Board seeks enforcement of its decision and order, 134 NLRB 1254, holding

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Spiewak

    179 F.2d 695 (3d Cir. 1950)   Cited 14 times

    No. 9875. Argued March 24, 1949. Reargued May 16, 1949 and December 1, 1949. Decided February 2, 1950. Rehearing Denied March 11, 1950. Arnold Ordman, Washington, D.C. (David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Gerald H. Chambers, New York City (Chambers Chambers, New York City, on the brief), for respondents. Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and MARIS, GOODRICH, McLAUGHLIN, O'CONNELL, KALODNER

  9. W.T. Rawleigh Co. v. National Labor Rel. Board

    190 F.2d 832 (7th Cir. 1951)   Cited 12 times
    In Rawleigh, delivery and shipment of property was impeded, and nonstriking employees were unable to enter the plant for more than a month because of the "breast to back" picketing technique and were repelled by physical force if they attempted to enter.