§

Kimble Glass Co.

113 N.L.R.B. 577 (N.L.R.B. 1955)
Kimble Glass Co.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board

    324 U.S. 793 (1945)   Cited 495 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Illinois Tool Works

    153 F.2d 811 (7th Cir. 1946)   Cited 47 times
    Noting that the test for violations of sec. 8, now codified as sec. 8, of the NLRA is whether "the employer engaged in conduct which, it may reasonably be said, tends to interfere with the free exercise of employee rights under the Act," and that actual or successful coercion need not be shown in order for the Board to find a violation

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. May Dept. Stores

    154 F.2d 533 (8th Cir. 1946)   Cited 26 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. May Dept. Stores Co., 154 F.2d 533 (8th Cir. 1946), the Court approved the Board's order banning solicitation at all times on the selling floor of the retail store, including during the employees' lunch hour.

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Hudson Motor Car

    128 F.2d 528 (6th Cir. 1942)   Cited 29 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Hudson Motor Car Co., 6 Cir., 128 F.2d 528, 533, it was stated: "We think it right and just to say that so far as the record shows, respondent has not wilfully violated the provisions of the Act, but the intent of the employer is not within the ambit of our power of review.

  5. Maryland Drydock Co. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    183 F.2d 538 (4th Cir. 1950)   Cited 19 times
    In Maryland Drydock Co. v. NLRB, 183 F.2d 538, 539 (4th Cir. 1950), we held that an employer was entitled to maintain discipline by prohibiting "defamatory and insulting statements which reasonably tend to destroy such discipline....

  6. McQuay-Norris Mfg. Co. v. Natl. Labor R. Board

    116 F.2d 748 (7th Cir. 1940)   Cited 29 times

    No. 7269. December 23, 1940. Petition for Review of Order of National Labor Relations Board. Proceeding by the McQuay-Norris Manufacturing Company to review an order of the National Labor Relations Board. The Board requested enforcement of its order. Request for enforcement allowed. Barnes, Hickam, Pantzer Boyd and Paul Y. Davis, all of Indianapolis, Ind. (Kurt F. Pantzer, of Indianapolis, Ind., of counsel), for petitioner. Gerhard P. Van Arkel, of Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before EVANS and

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Star Pub. Co.

    97 F.2d 465 (9th Cir. 1938)   Cited 23 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Star Publishing Co., 9 Cir., 97 F.2d 465, branch managers were held to be employees, while in National Labor Relations Board v. American Potash Chemical Corp., 9 Cir., 98 F.2d 488, a foreman was reinstated upon the ground that he had been unfairly discharged.

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Puerto Rico S.S

    211 F.2d 274 (1st Cir. 1954)   Cited 3 times

    No. 4779. March 26, 1954. George L. Weasler, San Juan, P.R. (George J. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. General Counsel, and Samuel M. Singer and Ruth V. Reel, Attorneys, Washington, D.C., on brief), for petitioner. Charles R. Hartzell, Rafael O. Fernandez and Jose L. Novas, San Juan, P.R., for respondents Puerto Rico S.S. Ass'n and its member companies. James R. Beverley and Jose Lopez Baralt, San Juan, P.R., for respondent South Porto