§

KFC National Management Co.

204 N.L.R.B. 630 (N.L.R.B. 1973)
KFC National Management Co.

10 Cited authorities

  1. United States v. Morgan

    313 U.S. 409 (1941)   Cited 852 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Secretary of Agriculture should not have been ordered to testify "regarding the process by which he reached the conclusions of his [stockyard market rate-setting] order, including the manner and extent of his study of the record and his consultation with subordinates"

  2. Pittsburgh Glass Co. v. Board

    313 U.S. 146 (1941)   Cited 294 times
    In Pittsburgh Glass, the Court held that it was not a denial of due process for the Board to refuse to consider evidence relating to the certification issue when petitioner first sought to introduce such evidence at the unfair labor practice hearing.

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Golden Age Beverage Co.

    415 F.2d 26 (5th Cir. 1969)   Cited 95 times
    In NLRB v. Golden Age Beverage Company, 415 F.2d 26, 30 (5th Cir. 1969), this court apparently considered hearsay evidence at this stage of proceedings to set aside an election.

  4. Herrin Transportation Co. v. United States

    366 U.S. 419 (1961)   Cited 28 times

    APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. No. 837. Decided May 22, 1961. 186 F. Supp. 777, affirmed. Carl L. Phinney for appellant. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Richard A. Solomon, Robert W. Ginnane and James Y. Piper for the United States, and Ewell H. Muse, Jr. for Strickland Transportation Co., appellees. PER CURIAM. The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

  5. T.S.C. Motor Freight Lines, Inc. v. United States

    186 F. Supp. 777 (S.D. Tex. 1960)   Cited 39 times
    In T.S.C. Motor Freight Lines, Inc. v. United States, 186 F.Supp. 777 (S.D.Tx.1960), the documents were authored by Interstate Commerce Commission attorney-advisors who did not participate in the functions of the Commission " nor do they take part in the proceedings before the Hearing Examiner."

  6. Follett Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    397 F.2d 91 (7th Cir. 1968)   Cited 20 times

    No. 16221. June 10, 1968. Robert C. Claus, James S. Petrie, John P. Jacoby, Chicago, Ill., Vedder, Price, Kaufman Kammholz, Chicago, Ill., of counsel, for petitioners. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, George B. Driesen, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Fred R. Kimmel, Atty., N.L.R.B., for respondent. Before CASTLE, Chief Judge, and SWYGERT and CUMMINGS, Circuit Judges. SWYGERT, Circuit Judge. Follett Corporation

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Burnett Construction Company

    350 F.2d 57 (10th Cir. 1965)   Cited 15 times

    No. 8039. August 6, 1965. Melvin H. Reifin, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Warren M. Davidson, Atty., N.L.R.B., with him on the brief), for petitioner. Harold B. Wagner, Denver, Colo., for respondent. Before PHILLIPS, PICKETT and LEWIS, Circuit Judges. PICKETT, Circuit Judge. This proceeding is here on the Board's petition for enforcement of its order directing respondent to cease and desist

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Commerce Co.

    328 F.2d 600 (5th Cir. 1964)   Cited 12 times

    No. 20477. March 3, 1964. Rehearing Denied March 30, 1964. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Dominick Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Solomon I. Hirsh, Paula Omansky, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Charles R. Vickery, Jr., Liddell, Austin, Dawson Sapp, Houston, Tex., Harley W. McConnell, Houston, Tex., for respondent. Before HUTCHESON and GRIFFIN B. BELL, Circuit Judges, and BREWSTER, District Judge. HUTCHESON, Circuit

  9. LTV Electrosystems, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    388 F.2d 683 (4th Cir. 1968)   Cited 7 times

    No. 11560. Argued January 10, 1968. Decided January 18, 1968. Knox L. Haynsworth, Jr., Greenville, S.C. (Thompson, Ogletree Haynsworth, Greenville, S.C., on brief), for petitioner. Lawrence M. Joseph, Attorney, N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel and Corinna Lothar Metcalf, Attorney, N.L.R.B., on brief), for respondent. Before BOREMAN, WINTER and BUTZNER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: LTV Electrosystems

  10. Intertype Co., Div. of Harris-Intertype v. Penello

    269 F. Supp. 573 (W.D. Va. 1967)   Cited 5 times

    No. 66-C-34-H. February 18, 1967. Kenneth C. McGuiness, Vedder, Price, Kaufman, Kammholz McGuiness, Washington, D.C., Flournoy L. Largent, Jr., Largent, Anderson Larrick, Winchester, Va., for plaintiff. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., David C. Sachs, Regional Atty., Region 5, N.L.R.B., Baltimore, Md., for defendants. OPINION MICHIE, District Judge. Plaintiff, Harris-Intertype Corporation, seeks to have this court compel the production of an investigation file