§

Keystone Automotive Industries, Inc.

365 NLRB No. 60 (N.L.R.B. 2017)
Keystone Automotive Industries, Inc.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Canning

    573 U.S. 513 (2014)   Cited 274 times   150 Legal Analyses
    Holding that because there was no quorum of validly appointed board members, the NLRB “lacked authority to act,” and the enforcement order was therefore “void ab initio ”

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Wyman-Gordon Co.

    394 U.S. 759 (1969)   Cited 809 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding invalid a legislative rule developed in agency adjudication

  3. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 710 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

  4. Brooks v. Labor Board

    348 U.S. 96 (1954)   Cited 300 times
    Holding that an employer has a duty to bargain in good faith for one year beginning on the date of certification of the bargaining representative by the Board

  5. Avecor, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    931 F.2d 924 (D.C. Cir. 1991)   Cited 68 times
    Noting that inferences drawn from expertise may "reduce the weight of evidence necessary to impute knowledge ... but ... do not wholly eliminate the need for evidence"

  6. California Gas Tran. v. N.L.R.B

    507 F.3d 847 (5th Cir. 2007)   Cited 9 times
    Acknowledging that terminating employment based on union activity is an unfair labor practice subject to the NLRA

  7. Lee Lumber and Bldg. Material v. N.L.R.B

    310 F.3d 209 (D.C. Cir. 2002)   Cited 5 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Stating that this court "`review the Board's factual conclusions' only for `substantial evidence,' and must `uphold the Board's application of law to facts unless arbitrary or otherwise erroneous'" (quoting Harter Tomato Products Co. v. NLRB, 133 F.3d 934, 937 (D.C. Cir. 1998))

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

    463 F.2d 184 (5th Cir. 1972)   Cited 2 times

    No. 72-1179. Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409. June 6, 1972. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Charles M. Paschal, Jr., Director, Region 15, N.L.R.B., Harry L. Hopkins, New Orleans, La., Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, Louis v. Baldovin, Jr., Atty., N.L.R.B., for petitioner. Andrew C. Partee, Jr., Kullman, Lang, Keenan, Inman Bee, New Orleans, La., for respondent