§

Key Food Stores Cooperative, Inc.

286 N.L.R.B. 1056 (N.L.R.B. 1987)
Key Food Stores Cooperative, Inc.

10 Cited authorities

  1. Gideon v. Wainwright

    372 U.S. 335 (1963)   Cited 8,477 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Sixth Amendment requires counsel in all state felony prosecutions

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  3. Wolf v. Colorado

    338 U.S. 25 (1949)   Cited 1,176 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that exclusionary rule did not apply to the states

  4. Betts v. Brady

    316 U.S. 455 (1942)   Cited 902 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Sixth Amendment required the appointment of counsel in all federal criminal cases in which the defendant was unable to retain an attorney, but that the Due Process Clause required appointment of counsel in state criminal cases only where “want of counsel ... result[ed] in a conviction lacking in ... fundamental fairness”

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  6. Prill v. N.L.R.B

    755 F.2d 941 (D.C. Cir. 1985)   Cited 80 times   3 Legal Analyses
    In Prill v. NLRB, 755 F.2d 941, 948 (D.C. Cir. 1985), the D.C. Circuit remanded a case to the agency because "a regulation [was] based on an incorrect view of applicable law."

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Intertherm, Inc.

    596 F.2d 267 (8th Cir. 1979)   Cited 36 times
    Holding that employees have a near-absolute right to wear union insignia in the absence of evidence relating to employee efficiency or plant discipline

  8. Larand Leisurelies, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    523 F.2d 814 (6th Cir. 1975)   Cited 37 times

    No. 74-2325. Argued June 10, 1975. Decided October 1, 1975. As Amended October 15, 1975. W. Bruce Baird, Matthew R. Westfall, Middleton, Reutlinger Baird, Louisville, Ky., Jay S. Siegel, Siegel, O'Connor Kainen, Hartford, Conn., for petitioner. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Hope P. Zelasko, Emil C. Farkas, Regional Director, 9th Region, N.L.R.B., Cincinnati, Ohio, for respondent. Herbert L. Segal, Irwin H. Cutler, Jr., Segal, Isenberg, Sales, Stewart Nutt

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Milco, Inc.

    388 F.2d 133 (2d Cir. 1968)   Cited 32 times

    Nos. 108, 109, Dockets 31412, 31418. Argued October 19, 1967. Decided January 2, 1968. Corinna Lothar Metcalf, Atty., NLRB; Arnold Ordman, General Counsel; Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel; Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel; Gary Green, Attorney, NLRB, for petitioner. Harry H. Rains, Bertrand B. Pogrebin, Mineola, N.Y., for respondents. Before WATERMAN, MOORE and HAYS, Circuit Judges. WATERMAN, Circuit Judge: The National Labor Relations Board, having found that respondents had engaged

  10. Section 6621 - Determination of rate of interest

    26 U.S.C. § 6621   Cited 1,873 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Applying a higher interest rate to past liabilities resulting from tax-motivated transactions