5 Cited authorities
N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.
662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981) Cited 357 times 46 Legal AnalysesHolding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fant Milling Co.
360 U.S. 301 (1959) Cited 106 times 1 Legal AnalysesHolding that an untimely allegation of an unlawful unilateral wage increase was sufficiently related to a timely refusal-to-bargain charge, because the wage increase "largely influenced" the Board's finding that an unlawful refusal to bargain had occurred
N.L.R.B. v. Kentucky Tennessee Clay Co.
295 F.3d 436 (4th Cir. 2002) Cited 7 timesNo. 01-2202. Argued May 7, 2002. Decided July 12, 2002. Appeal from the Court of Appeals, Traxler, Circuit Judge. ARGUED: Walter Odell Lambeth, Jr., Elarbee, Thompson, Sapp Wilson, L.L.P., Atlanta, Georgia, for Respondent. Fred B. Jacob, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. ON BRIEF: Jeffrey S. Hiller, Elarbee, Thompson, Sapp Wilson, L.L.P., Atlanta, Georgia, for Respondent. Arthur F. Rosenfeld, General, John E. Higgins, Jr., Acting Deputy General, John H. Ferguson, Associate
Ishikawa Gasket America, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
354 F.3d 534 (6th Cir. 2004) Cited 2 timesNo. 02-1167/1310. Argued: October 21, 2003. Decided and Filed: January 7, 2004. ON PETITION FOR REVIEW AND CROSS-APPLICATION FOR ENFORCEMENT OF AN ORDER OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD. No. 8-CA-31292. Maurice G. Jenkins (argued and briefed), Paul R. Bernard (abriefed), Jennifer K. Nowaczok (briefed), Dickinson, Wright, PLLC, Detroit, MI, for Petitioner. David Seid (argued and briefed), National Labor Relations Board, Office of General Counsel, Washington, DC, Aileen A. Armstrong (briefed)
Section 6621 - Determination of rate of interest
26 U.S.C. § 6621 Cited 1,873 times 23 Legal AnalysesApplying a higher interest rate to past liabilities resulting from tax-motivated transactions