§

Kentucky River Medical Center

09-CA-042249 (N.L.R.B. Jul. 28, 2008)
Kentucky River Medical Center

12 Cited authorities

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,675 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. J. Weingarten, Inc.

    420 U.S. 251 (1975)   Cited 434 times   64 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer commits an unfair labor practice by compelling an employee to attend an investigatory meeting that could lead to discipline without allowing the employee to bring a union witness

  4. National Labor Rel. B. v. Kentucky R. Comm. C

    532 U.S. 706 (2001)   Cited 180 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the burden of proving a statutory exception generally falls on the party who claims a benefit

  5. Labor Bd. v. Washington Aluminum Co.

    370 U.S. 9 (1962)   Cited 206 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that certain employee conduct crosses the line from protected activity to "indefensible" conduct that loses NLRA protections

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. District Council of Iron Workers of California & Vicinity

    124 F.3d 1094 (9th Cir. 1997)   Cited 48 times

    No. 95-70772 Argued November 8, 1996 — San Francisco, California. Submission deferred November, 8, 1996 Submitted November 20, 1996 The panel finds this case appropriate for submission on the briefs without oral argument pursuant to Fed.R.App.P. 34(a) and 9th Cir. R. 34-4. Decided September 4, 1997 COUNSEL Margaret Gaines Neigus, Deborah E. Shrager, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, DC, for petitioner. Victor J. Van Bourg, Van Bourg, Weinberg, Roger Rosenfeld, Oakland, Ca, for respondents

  8. Parts v. National

    260 F. App'x 607 (4th Cir. 2008)

    Nos. 07-1178, 07-1290. Argued December 4, 2007. Decided January 7, 2008. On Petition for Review and Cross-application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. (12-CA-16449; 12-CA16741). ARGUED: Cathy M. Stutin, Fisher Phillips, L.L.P., Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, for Parts Depot, Incorporated. Christopher Warren Young, National Labor Relations Board, Office of the General Counsel, Washington, D.C., for the Board; Brent Garren, Unite Here, New York, New York, for Unite Here

  9. Ishikawa Gasket America, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    354 F.3d 534 (6th Cir. 2004)   Cited 2 times

    No. 02-1167/1310. Argued: October 21, 2003. Decided and Filed: January 7, 2004. ON PETITION FOR REVIEW AND CROSS-APPLICATION FOR ENFORCEMENT OF AN ORDER OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD. No. 8-CA-31292. Maurice G. Jenkins (argued and briefed), Paul R. Bernard (abriefed), Jennifer K. Nowaczok (briefed), Dickinson, Wright, PLLC, Detroit, MI, for Petitioner. David Seid (argued and briefed), National Labor Relations Board, Office of General Counsel, Washington, DC, Aileen A. Armstrong (briefed)

  10. BYAS v. NEV. STATE BD

    119 Nev. 799 (Nev. 2003)   Cited 1 times

    No. 41019. August 13, 2003. Appeal from the Second Judicial District, Janet J. Berry, D.J. Decisions Without Published Opinions Dismissed-Stipulation.