§

Kentucky May Coal Co.

317 N.L.R.B. 60 (N.L.R.B. 1995)
Kentucky May Coal Co.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  3. N.L.R.B. v. S.E. Nichols, Inc.

    862 F.2d 952 (2d Cir. 1988)   Cited 30 times
    Finding that violations at various locations managed by the same district supervisor justified an order covering all locations managed by that district supervisor

  4. Great Chinese Am. Sewing Co. v. N.L.R.B

    578 F.2d 251 (9th Cir. 1978)   Cited 35 times
    Holding Board's failure to order restoration of sewing plant was not abuse of discretion in light of trend in garment industry to subcontract sewing work to low-cost foreign companies

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Townhouse T. V. Appliances, Inc.

    531 F.2d 826 (7th Cir. 1976)   Cited 26 times
    Declining to enforce an order to resume the original business because taking back the subcontracted work would be burdensome

  6. Coronet Foods, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    981 F.2d 1284 (D.C. Cir. 1993)   Cited 6 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Coronet, discussed supra, Coronet made the argument that the Board abused its discretion in failing to consider the decision of the district court, which held that there was an undue burden in implementing the temporary relief because of financial hardship.

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Daybreak Lodge Nursing & Convalescent Home, Inc.

    585 F.2d 79 (3d Cir. 1978)   Cited 11 times

    No. 77-2270. Argued July 25, 1978. Decided October 17, 1978. As Amended December 5, 1978. Barry F. Bevacqua, Julius M. Steiner, Pechner, Dorfman, Wolffe, Rounick Cabot, Philadelphia, Pa., for respondent. Elliott Moore, Madge F. Jefferson, Robert Sewell, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Before ADAMS, WEIS and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges. OPINION OF THE COURT A. LEON HIGGINBOTHAM, Jr., Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board (Board) has filed suit pursuant to 10(e) of the National

  8. N.L.R.B. v. North Carolina Coastal Motor Lines

    542 F.2d 637 (4th Cir. 1976)   Cited 8 times

    Nos. 76-1135, 76-1401. Argued August 25, 1976. Decided September 29, 1976. David F. Zorensky, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (John S. Irving, Jr., Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief), for petitioner in No. 76-1135 and for respondent in No. 76-1401. Robert A. Valois, Raleigh, N.C. (Frank P. Ward, Jr., Maupin, Taylor Ellis, Raleigh, N.C., on brief), for respondent in No. 76-1135 and for petitioner

  9. Hambre Hombre Enterprises, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    581 F.2d 204 (9th Cir. 1978)   Cited 6 times

    No. 77-1613. July 12, 1978. Rehearing Denied September 5, 1978. Ralph M. Segura, Walnut Creek, Cal., for petitioner. Paul J. Spielberg (argued), Elliott Moore, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Petition to Review Final Order of the National Labor Relations Board and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before SNEED and TANG, Circuit Judges, and ORRICK, District Judge. Honorable William H. Orrick, United States District Judge for the Northern District