§

Kenneth L. Ryfkogel, Complainant, v. Richard J. Danzig, Secretary, Department of the Navy, Agency.

01A03701 (E.E.O.C. Aug. 16, 2000)
Kenneth L. Ryfkogel, Complainant, v. Richard J. Danzig, Secretary, Department of the Navy, Agency.

4 Cited authorities

  1. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v. Darden

    503 U.S. 318 (1992)   Cited 1,478 times   44 Legal Analyses
    Holding that where the statute does not helpfully define the term "employee," courts should apply its established meaning

  2. Community for Creative Non-Violence v. Reid

    490 U.S. 730 (1989)   Cited 1,152 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "In determining whether a hired party is an employee under the general common law of agency, we consider the hiring party's right to control the manner and means by which the product is accomplished" and listing several factors relevant to this inquiry

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. United Insurance Co. of America

    390 U.S. 254 (1968)   Cited 325 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "all of the incidents of the relationship must be assessed and weighed with no one factor being decisive"

  4. Spirides v. Reinhardt

    613 F.2d 826 (D.C. Cir. 1979)   Cited 271 times
    Holding "no one factor is determinative" of whether individual is employee or independent contractor for purposes of Title VII