Kenneth H.,1 Complainant, v. Jeff B. Sessions, Attorney General, Department of Justice (Federal Bureau of Prisons), Agency.

21 Cited authorities

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green

    411 U.S. 792 (1973)   Cited 53,515 times   98 Legal Analyses
    Holding in employment discrimination case that statistical evidence of employer's general policy and practice may be relevant circumstantial evidence of discriminatory intent behind individual employment decision
  2. St. Mary's Honor Ctr. v. Hicks

    509 U.S. 502 (1993)   Cited 12,433 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a trier of fact may infer discrimination upon rejecting an employer's proffered reason for termination
  3. Tex. Dept. of Cmty. Affairs v. Burdine

    450 U.S. 248 (1981)   Cited 20,285 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding in the Title VII context that the plaintiff's prima facie case creates "a legally mandatory, rebuttable presumption" that shifts the burden of proof to the employer, and "if the employer is silent in the face of the presumption, the court must enter judgment for the plaintiff"
  4. U.S. Postal Service Bd. of Govs. v. Aikens

    460 U.S. 711 (1983)   Cited 2,426 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that because "[t]here will seldom be `eyewitness' testimony to the employer's mental process," evidence of the employer's discriminatory attitude in general is relevant and admissible to prove discrimination
  5. Furnco Construction Corp. v. Waters

    438 U.S. 567 (1978)   Cited 2,187 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a district court was "entitled to consider the racial mix of the work force when trying to make the determination as to motivation" in the employment discrimination context
  6. Corning Glass Works v. Brennan

    417 U.S. 188 (1974)   Cited 1,439 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer has the burden of proof to show that it falls within the stated exemption
  7. Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.

    567 F.2d 429 (D.C. Cir. 1976)   Cited 355 times
    Holding that under Title VII class action, single-filing cannot revive claims that are no longer viable at the time of filing
  8. Hochstadt v. Worcester Foundation for Experimental Biology

    545 F.2d 222 (1st Cir. 1976)   Cited 249 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, in balancing the scope of reasonable opposition conduct, "[t]he requirements of the job and the tolerable limits of conduct in a particular setting must be explored"
  9. Hochstadt v. Worcester Foundation, Etc.

    425 F. Supp. 318 (D. Mass. 1976)   Cited 87 times
    Holding that discharge six months after EEOC settlement and a month after an informal complaint satisfies causation requirement
  10. Section 2000e - Definitions

    42 U.S.C. § 2000e   Cited 52,769 times   131 Legal Analyses
    Granting EEOC authority to issue procedural regulations to carry out Title VII provisions
  11. Section 206 - Minimum wage

    29 U.S.C. § 206   Cited 9,130 times   103 Legal Analyses
    Asking only whether the alleged inequality resulted from “any other factor other than sex”
  12. Section 1614.105 - Pre-complaint processing

    29 C.F.R. § 1614.105   Cited 2,708 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Requiring complainant initially to notify agency and make effort to resolve matter informally
  13. Section 1614.107 - Dismissals of complaints

    29 C.F.R. § 1614.107   Cited 482 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Explaining the notice requirements for partial dismissal of claims in an EEO complaint
  14. Section 1614.110 - Final action by agencies

    29 C.F.R. § 1614.110   Cited 231 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Compelling final decision “within 60 days of the end of the 30-day period for the complainant to request a hearing . . . where the complainant has not requested [one]”
  15. Section 1614.604 - Filing and computation of time

    29 C.F.R. § 1614.604   Cited 140 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Providing the time limits applicable to the subject regulations "are subject to waiver, estoppel and equitable tolling"
  16. Section 1620.14 - Testing equality of jobs

    29 C.F.R. § 1620.14   Cited 93 times
    Explaining that the requirements of substantially equal skill, effort, and responsibility are separate tests, each of which must be met
  17. Section 1614.405 - Decisions on appeals

    29 C.F.R. § 1614.405   Cited 83 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Providing that " decision [of the EEOC in an administrative appeal] is final . . . unless . . . [e]ither party files a timely request for reconsideration"
  18. Section 1620.15 - Jobs requiring equal skill in performance

    29 C.F.R. § 1620.15   Cited 78 times
    Discussing ability as a subfactor of skill
  19. Section 1620.17 - Jobs requiring equal responsibility in performance

    29 C.F.R. § 1620.17   Cited 58 times
    Stating that "payment of a higher rate" to an employee who has "additional degree of responsibility which may materially affect the business operations of the employer" is permissible
  20. Section 1620.16 - Jobs requiring equal effort in performance

    29 C.F.R. § 1620.16   Cited 38 times
    Stating that "[w]here substantial differences exist in the amount or degree of effort required to be expended in the performance of jobs, the equal pay standard cannot apply even though the jobs may be equal in all other respects"
  21. Section 1614.403 - How to appeal

    29 C.F.R. § 1614.403   Cited 34 times
    Indicating that failure to file timely appeal requires dismissal by EEOC