3 Cited authorities
Southwire Company v. N.L.R.B
383 F.2d 235 (5th Cir. 1967) Cited 34 times 2 Legal AnalysesDiscussing an employer's right to express an opinion regarding unionization rather than its right to unionize
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. TRW-Semiconductors, Inc.
385 F.2d 753 (9th Cir. 1967) Cited 20 timesNo. 21549. November 24, 1967. Gregory L. Hellrung, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (argued) for petitioner. Stanley Tobin (argued), Hill, Farrer Burrill, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent. Before BARNES and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges, and HAUK, District Judge. DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge. Petition to enforce an order of the National Labor Relations Board. The trial examiner found, and the Board adopted his findings, that respondent employer interfered with, restrained and coerced its employees with respect
N.L.R.B. v. Hawthorn Company
404 F.2d 1205 (8th Cir. 1969) Cited 15 timesNo. 19248. January 3, 1969. Ronald W. Egnor, Attorney, N.L.R.B., for petitioner; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Assistant General Counsel, N.L.R.B., and Elliott Moore, Attorney, N.L.R.B., were on the brief with Mr. Egnor. Frederick S. Kullman, of Kullman Lang, New Orleans, La., for respondent, Hawthorn Company; Richard C. Keenan, New Orleans, La., was on the brief with Frederick S. Kullman, New Orleans, La. Donald