Keith T. Turner, Complainant, v. Robert M. Gates, Secretary, Department of Defense, Agency.

6 Cited authorities

Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
340 U.S. 474 (1951) Cited 9,669 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "
Pullman-Standard v. Swint
456 U.S. 273 (1982) Cited 1,624 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that "[w]hen an appellate court discerns that a district court has failed to make a finding because of an erroneous view of the law, the usual rule is that there should be a remand for further proceedings to permit the trial court to make the missing findings"
Carson v. Bethlehem Steel Corporation
82 F.3d 157 (7th Cir. 1996) Cited 294 times
Holding that a race discrimination plaintiff need not establish he was replaced by a member of a different race but the "question instead is whether the plaintiff has established a logical reason to believe that the decision rests on a legally forbidden ground"
Goostree v. Tennessee
796 F.2d 854 (6th Cir. 1986) Cited 123 times
Holding that patronage system based on family, friends, and politics is not the same as sex discrimination
Bauer v. Bailar
647 F.2d 1037 (10th Cir. 1981) Cited 81 times
Holding employer's subjective hiring criteria to be nonpretextual where the subjective factors considered were articulated and generally relevant to the job
Kennedy v. Landon
598 F.2d 337 (4th Cir. 1979) Cited 20 times
Finding pre-selection did not violate discrimination prohibited by Title VII, even though such conduct may have violated the rules and regulations of the Department of Corrections

Keith T. Turner, Complainant, v. Robert M. Gates, Secretary, Department of Defense, Agency.

6 Cited authorities

Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "

Pullman-Standard v. Swint

Holding that "[w]hen an appellate court discerns that a district court has failed to make a finding because of an erroneous view of the law, the usual rule is that there should be a remand for further proceedings to permit the trial court to make the missing findings"

Carson v. Bethlehem Steel Corporation

Holding that a race discrimination plaintiff need not establish he was replaced by a member of a different race but the "question instead is whether the plaintiff has established a logical reason to believe that the decision rests on a legally forbidden ground"

Goostree v. Tennessee

Holding that patronage system based on family, friends, and politics is not the same as sex discrimination

Bauer v. Bailar

Holding employer's subjective hiring criteria to be nonpretextual where the subjective factors considered were articulated and generally relevant to the job

Kennedy v. Landon

Finding pre-selection did not violate discrimination prohibited by Title VII, even though such conduct may have violated the rules and regulations of the Department of Corrections