§
Keco Industries

3 Cited authorities

  1. McLaughlin v. United States

    476 U.S. 16 (1986)   Cited 134 times
    Holding that each reason is "independently sufficient [to] support conclusion"

  2. N.L.R.B. v. W. C. McQuaide, Inc.

    552 F.2d 519 (3d Cir. 1977)   Cited 40 times
    In McQuaide, supra, we stated flatly: "Rather than focus on either the subjective intent of the striker or the perception of the `victim,' we adopt an objective standard to determine whether conduct constitutes a threat sufficiently egregious to justify" the imposition of sanctions by the employer.

  3. Lima v. N.L.R.B

    819 F.2d 300 (D.C. Cir. 1987)   Cited 1 times

    No. 86-1182. Argued February 10, 1987. Decided May 19, 1987. David M. Silberman, with whom Harry Huge, Gary K. Harris, Allison Beck and Laurence Gold, were on brief, for petitioner. Angelo V. Arcadipane, Washington, D.C., also entered an appearance for petitioner. Marc B. Seidman, Atty., N.L.R.B., with whom Robert E. Allen, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, John H. Ferguson and Barbara A. Atkin, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., were on brief, for respondent