§

Kathlyn K.,1 Complainant, v. Penny Pritzker, Secretary, Department of Commerce, Agency.

0120141544 (E.E.O.C. Aug. 3, 2016)
Kathlyn K.,1 Complainant, v. Penny Pritzker, Secretary, Department of Commerce, Agency.

3 Cited authorities

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,577 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "

  2. Pullman-Standard v. Swint

    456 U.S. 273 (1982)   Cited 1,615 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[w]hen an appellate court discerns that a district court has failed to make a finding because of an erroneous view of the law, the usual rule is that there should be a remand for further proceedings to permit the trial court to make the missing findings"

  3. Arnett v. Kennedy

    416 U.S. 134 (1974)   Cited 1,590 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that federal statute authorizing discharge of federal employees for "such cause as will promote the efficiency of the service" was neither void for vagueness nor overbroad in light of "longstanding principles of employer-employee relationships" and "[the availability of legal counsel] to employees who [sought] advice on the interpretation of the Act and its regulations"